We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare AWS WAF vs. Azure Web Application Firewall

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS WAF vs. Azure Web Application Firewall and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
543,424 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The security firewall plus the features that protect against database injections or scripting,""The most valuable feature is the scalability because it automatically scales up or scales down as per our requirements.""The most valuable aspect is that it protects our code. It's a bit difficult to overwrite code in our application. It also protects against threats.""AWS has flexibility in terms of WAF rules.""This product supplies options for web security for applications accessing sensitive information.""Its best feature is that it is on the cloud and does not require local hardware resources.""The access instruction feature is the most valuable. This is what we use the most.""The most valuable features are the geo-restriction denials and the web ACL."

More AWS WAF Pros »

"The most valuable feature is that it allows us to publish our applications behind the firewall.""It has been a stable product in my experience.""We have found the most valuable features to be the web application, minimal skills required for management, control through policies, and automation.""The solution has good dashboards."

More Azure Web Application Firewall Pros »

Cons
"For now, there is no feature to protect against attack of the bad bots""I would like to be able to view a graphical deployment map in the user interface that will give me an overview of the configuration and help to determine whether I have missed any steps.""It's a bit difficult to apply the right rules for the right security.""When users choose the free service, there isn't great support available to them.""The technical support does not respond to bugs in the coding of the product.""The pricing model is complicated.""The setup is complicated.""It is sometimes a lot of work going through the rules and making sure you have everything covered for a use case. It is just the way rules are set and maintained in this solution. Some UI changes will probably be helpful. It is not easy to find the documentation of new features. Documentation not being updated is a common problem with all services, including this one. You have different versions of the console, and the options shown in the documentation are not there. For a new feature, there is probably an announcement about being released, but when it comes out, there is no actual documentation about how to use it. This makes you either go to technical support or community, which probably doesn't have an idea either. The documentation on the cloud should be the latest one. Finding information about a specific event can be a bit challenging. For this solution, not much documentation is available in the community. It could be because it is a new tool. Whenever there is an issue, it is just not that simple to resolve, especially if you don't have premium support. You have pretty much nowhere to look around, and you just need to poke around to try and make it work right."

More AWS WAF Cons »

"The management can be improved.""There is a need to be able to configure the solution more.""The support for proxy forwarding could improve.""Deployment should be simplified so that a non-techie can handle it."

More Azure Web Application Firewall Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"AWS is not that costly by comparison. They are maybe close to $40 per month. I think it was between $29 or $39.""It has a variable pricing scheme.""We are kind of doing a POC comparison to see what works best. Pricing-wise, AWS is one of the most attractive ones. It is fairly cheap, and we like the pricing part. We're trying to see what makes more sense operation-wise, license-wise, and pricing-wise.""It's quite affordable. It's in the middle.""The pricing should be more affordable, especially as it pertains to small clients."

More AWS WAF Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We have an enterprise agreement with Microsoft and the pricing is good.""The price is for this solution is fair and there is a license needed.""The price of the solution depends on your architecture and how you manage it. You can control the cost in Azure quite well. The costs do not directly correlate to expenses in the features we are using."

More Azure Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
543,424 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Hi Varun, I have had experienced with several WAF deployments and deep technical assessments of the following: 1. Imperva WAF 2. F5 WAF 3. Polarisec Cloud WAF Typical limitations on cloud… more »
Top Answer: Their technical support has been quite good.
Top Answer: It has been a stable product in my experience.
Top Answer: The price is for this solution is fair and there is a license needed.
Top Answer: There is a need to be able to configure the solution more. In the future, I would like to see the ability to activate using a public or private IP.
Ranking
Views
13,517
Comparisons
11,532
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
576
Rating
7.8
Views
520
Comparisons
429
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
299
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
AWS Web Application Firewall
Learn More
Overview

AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources. AWS WAF gives you control over which traffic to allow or block to your web applications by defining customizable web security rules. You can use AWS WAF to create custom rules that block common attack patterns, such as SQL injection or cross-site scripting, and rules that are designed for your specific application. New rules can be deployed within minutes, letting you respond quickly to changing traffic patterns. Also, AWS WAF includes a full-featured API that you can use to automate the creation, deployment, and maintenance of web security rules.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) provides centralized protection of your web applications from common exploits and vulnerabilities. Web applications are increasingly targeted by malicious attacks that exploit commonly known vulnerabilities. SQL injection and cross-site scripting are among the most common attacks.

Offer
Learn more about AWS WAF
Learn more about Azure Web Application Firewall
Sample Customers
eVitamins, 9Splay, Senao International
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company25%
Media Company25%
Transportation Company13%
Manufacturing Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider20%
Media Company13%
Financial Services Firm8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider21%
Insurance Company11%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise50%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS WAF vs. Azure Web Application Firewall and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
543,424 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AWS WAF is ranked 3rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 10 reviews while Azure Web Application Firewall is ranked 21st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 4 reviews. AWS WAF is rated 7.8, while Azure Web Application Firewall is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "Use this product to make it possible to deploy web applications securely". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Web Application Firewall writes "Straightforward to set up, brilliant support, and it allows us to publish applications behind the firewall". AWS WAF is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva Web Application Firewall, Akamai Kona Site Defender, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and Barracuda Web Application Firewall, whereas Azure Web Application Firewall is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, Imperva Incapsula and Signal Sciences. See our AWS WAF vs. Azure Web Application Firewall report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.