Compare AWS WAF vs. Comodo cWatch

AWS WAF is ranked 4th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 10 reviews while Comodo cWatch is ranked 13th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. AWS WAF is rated 7.8, while Comodo cWatch is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "Makes sure files are protected, but the solution should be more proactive in detecting threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Comodo cWatch writes "Website malware removal was clean and perfect". AWS WAF is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva Incapsula and Akamai Kona Site Defender, whereas Comodo cWatch is most compared with Cloudflare, SiteLock and Sucuri.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AWS WAF Logo
4,851 views|3,932 comparisons
Comodo cWatch Logo
936 views|664 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Cloudflare, Reblaze and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2020.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
There are different scale options available for WAF.There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.It's an annual subscription.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
4,851
Comparisons
3,932
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
376
Avg. Rating
7.7
Views
936
Comparisons
664
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
136
Avg. Rating
10.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 49% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
AWS Web Application FirewallcWatch
Learn
Amazon
Video Not Available
Comodo
Overview

AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources. AWS WAF gives you control over which traffic to allow or block to your web applications by defining customizable web security rules. You can use AWS WAF to create custom rules that block common attack patterns, such as SQL injection or cross-site scripting, and rules that are designed for your specific application. New rules can be deployed within minutes, letting you respond quickly to changing traffic patterns. Also, AWS WAF includes a full-featured API that you can use to automate the creation, deployment, and maintenance of web security rules.

Cwatch delivers robust website protection from hackers - while it helps you stay calm when online. It does not just stop with protection but helps in scanning the website to remove malware instantly. It is a complete website security tool that delivers state-of-the-art protection techniques to ensure SMB website security from simple to complex threat landscape. It ensures early threat detection, instant solution and sophisticated preventive measures.

Offer
Learn more about AWS WAF
Learn more about Comodo cWatch
Sample Customers
eVitamins, 9Splay, Senao InternationalXerox, Intel, HP, UPS, Western Union, Western Digital
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company37%
Media Company16%
Comms Service Provider12%
Retailer6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Cloudflare, Reblaze and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2020.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.