We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Imperva Bot Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The ease of deployment of the product is valuable to me."
"The product’s availability, ease of configuration, and documentation are valuable."
"This product supplies options for web security for applications accessing sensitive information."
"Stable and scalable web application firewall. Setting it up is straightforward."
"One common use case is using detection protection for enhancing security models in AWS. Another use case is implementing log analysis and response recovery procedures for email services."
"The most valuable features of AWS WAF are its cloud-native and on-demand."
"The solution's initial setup process is easy."
"Rule groups are valuable."
"The stability of the product is good since I haven't had any problems with the solution."
"I am impressed with the product's automatic bot mechanism. It also gives us the control to create our own custom bot rules."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
"I believe there is a need to move towards real-time analysis with the help of AI and intelligent systems in the future. This would reduce the reliance on manual work and enhance the functionality of detection protection. By incorporating AI-driven data analysis and data science techniques, we can improve the solution's user-friendliness, security compatibility, and accuracy."
"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"We don't have much control over blocking, because the WAF is managed by AWS."
"Technical support for AWS WAF needs improvement."
"We need more support as we go global."
"The user experience, the interface, is lacking. Sometimes it's hard to find certain areas that it has alerted on."
"In a future release I would like to see automation. There's no interaction between the applications and that makes it tedious. We have to do the preparation all over again for each of our other applications."
"Sometimes, it takes a bit of time for the technical staff of the solution to get back to our company with a resolution for our problems."
"The tool needs to include artificial intelligence and machine learning. It also needs to improve profiling."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 51 reviews while Imperva Bot Management is ranked 4th in Bot Management with 2 reviews. AWS WAF is rated 8.2, while Imperva Bot Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva Bot Management writes "A product that offers advanced bot detection capabilities and reporting features". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva Web Application Firewall, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Imperva Bot Management is most compared with Cloudflare, Cequence Security, Akamai Bot Manager, DataDome Real-Time Bot Protection and HUMAN BotGuard for Applications.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.