We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The web solution effectively protects from vulnerabilities and cyber attacks."
"The most valuable aspect is that it protects our code. It's a bit difficult to overwrite code in our application. It also protects against threats."
"It's simple, easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the addition of managed tools that help us create customizable rules. In case we want to block a particular request, we can make use of those rules."
"The customizable features are good."
"One common use case is using detection protection for enhancing security models in AWS. Another use case is implementing log analysis and response recovery procedures for email services."
"This is not a product that you need to install. You just use it."
"The tool’s stability is very good."
"Since we are using this tool for protection purposes we really appreciate the hybrid security abilities; the main idea here is that we powerful protection our application needs."
"The pricing model is complicated."
"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"The solution could be more reliable."
"We haven't faced any problems with the solution."
"On the UI side, I would like it if they could bring back the geolocation view on the corner."
"AWS WAF should provide better protection to its users, and the security features need to improve."
"I would like to see it more tightly integrated with other AWS services."
"They have to do more to improve, to innovate more features. They need to increase the security. It has to be more active in detecting threats."
"There is a need for expanded licensing terms and options. There's also a need for improved and more agile customization features. The user needs to be able to manage each policy as required; the functionality needs to empower the user. There should be a complete suite of desktop provider policies available to users. Overall, it needs to be more user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 51 reviews while NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall is ranked 40th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). AWS WAF is rated 8.2, while NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall writes "Offers Application Protection Against Web Attacks". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva Web Application Firewall, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall is most compared with .
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.