We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Radware Alteon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's simple, easy to use."
"This product supplies options for web security for applications accessing sensitive information."
"It is a one-click WAF with no effort needed."
"The most valuable feature is the way it blocks threats to external applications."
"The initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment took about ten minutes or less."
"The most valuable feature is the security, making sure that files are protected, preventing unauthorized users from accessing the system."
"Their technical support has been quite good."
"The access instruction feature is the most valuable. This is what we use the most."
"Security is one of the most valuable features that I like. It is easy to use and easy to configure."
"I am finding SSL-TLS acceleration the most valuable function, with certificate management. It is easy to generate certificates and assign them to services"
"The strength of this solution is the application delivery controller."
"I like the ADC feature and the global certificate feature."
"The link load balancing is a great feature."
"The device blocks threats and allows legitimate users to work correctly."
"The interface is easy, it's friendly, and has good alerting."
"The command line interface is simple and very user-friendly."
"I would like to see it more tightly integrated with other AWS services."
"The product should improve the DDoS-related features."
"AWS WAF could improve by making the overall management easier. Many people that have started working with AWS WAF do not have an easy time. They should make it easy to use."
"When users choose the free service, there isn't great support available to them."
"The solution could be more reliable."
"The user experience, the interface, is lacking. Sometimes it's hard to find certain areas that it has alerted on."
"It will be helpful if the product recommends rules that we can implement."
"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"Their support can be better. The Radware management is very proactive. We can connect to anybody in Radware Management in India. We can even connect with the MD of Radware India. However, their lower level staff should be more proactive towards the customers."
"The interface implementation can be improved."
"Load balancing needs improvement. It needs better integration. I heard f5 works as a DNS operator which is not available in this solution. It would be better if that was implemented."
"Performance could be improved."
"It can be improved by combining the web application firewall (WAF) facility."
"I would like to see the loading documentation improved."
"The user interface can be improved."
"You need to have pretty good internal knowledge of the solution."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 30 reviews while Radware Alteon is ranked 10th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 21 reviews. AWS WAF is rated 8.2, while Radware Alteon is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "Easy to deploy, implement, and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware Alteon writes "Cost-effective, reduces downtime, and allows third-party SSL integration". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva Web Application Firewall, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Radware Alteon is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, A10 Networks Thunder ADC and Avi Networks Software Load Balancer. See our AWS WAF vs. Radware Alteon report.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.