Compare AWS WAF vs. Radware AppWall

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AWS WAF Logo
11,510 views|9,573 comparisons
Radware AppWall Logo
1,352 views|1,086 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS WAF vs. Radware AppWall and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,595 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment took about ten minutes or less.""The ability to take multiple data sets and match those data sets together is the solution's most valuable feature. The data lake that comes with it is very useful because that allows us to match data sets with different configurations that we wouldn't normally be able to match.""The security firewall plus the features that protect against database injections or scripting,""The most valuable feature is the scalability because it automatically scales up or scales down as per our requirements.""The most valuable aspect is that it protects our code. It's a bit difficult to overwrite code in our application. It also protects against threats.""AWS has flexibility in terms of WAF rules.""This product supplies options for web security for applications accessing sensitive information.""Its best feature is that it is on the cloud and does not require local hardware resources."

More AWS WAF Pros »

"The features that mitigate attacks are very valuable.""Security is one of the most valuable features that I like. It is easy to use and easy to configure.""I like the concept of self-service, that I can do everything on my own.""The product offers high availability."

More Radware AppWall Pros »

Cons
"They should work to define more threats, add more security, and make it more compliant with more security companies.""The solution is cloud-based, and therefore the billing model that comes with it could be more intuitive, in my opinion. It's very easy to not fully understand how you tag things for billing and then you can quite easily run up a high bill without realizing it. The solution needs to be more intuitive around the tagging system, which enables the billing. Right now, I have a cloud architect that does that on our behalf and it isn't something that a business user could use because it still requires quite a lot of technical knowledge to do effectively.""For now, there is no feature to protect against attack of the bad bots""I would like to be able to view a graphical deployment map in the user interface that will give me an overview of the configuration and help to determine whether I have missed any steps.""It's a bit difficult to apply the right rules for the right security.""When users choose the free service, there isn't great support available to them.""The technical support does not respond to bugs in the coding of the product.""The pricing model is complicated."

More AWS WAF Cons »

"The GUI needs to be improved. Right now, the solution isn't so user-friendly.""Support is very important because if we get good support, we'll be able to sell and supply more numbers.""You need to have pretty good internal knowledge of the solution."

More Radware AppWall Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"AWS is not that costly by comparison. They are maybe close to $40 per month. I think it was between $29 or $39.""It has a variable pricing scheme.""We are kind of doing a POC comparison to see what works best. Pricing-wise, AWS is one of the most attractive ones. It is fairly cheap, and we like the pricing part. We're trying to see what makes more sense operation-wise, license-wise, and pricing-wise.""It's quite affordable. It's in the middle."

More AWS WAF Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
474,595 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The access instruction feature is the most valuable. This is what we use the most.
Top Answer: We are kind of doing a POC comparison to see what works best. Pricing-wise, AWS is one of the most attractive ones. It is fairly cheap, and we like the pricing part. We're trying to see what makes… more »
Top Answer: It is sometimes a lot of work going through the rules and making sure you have everything covered for a use case. It is just the way rules are set and maintained in this solution. Some UI changes will… more »
Top Answer: For ADC, any ADC can do a good job. But in case if you want to add WAF functionality to the same ADC hardware you have to look for other ADC's like F5, Imperva, Radware, Fortinet, etc. 
Top Answer: The product offers high availability.
Top Answer: With a good configuration and a good understanding of the application, you can have very good integration with the web application firewall and Radware application. However, it isn't easy. We need to… more »
Ranking
Views
11,510
Comparisons
9,573
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
601
Rating
8.0
Views
1,352
Comparisons
1,086
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
530
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
AWS Web Application Firewall
Learn More
Overview

AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources. AWS WAF gives you control over which traffic to allow or block to your web applications by defining customizable web security rules. You can use AWS WAF to create custom rules that block common attack patterns, such as SQL injection or cross-site scripting, and rules that are designed for your specific application. New rules can be deployed within minutes, letting you respond quickly to changing traffic patterns. Also, AWS WAF includes a full-featured API that you can use to automate the creation, deployment, and maintenance of web security rules.

AppWall - Radware's Web Application Firewall (WAF), ensures fast, reliable and secure delivery of mission-critical Web applications for corporate networks and in the cloud. AppWall is an ICSA Labs certified and PCI compliant WAF that combines positive and negative security models to provide complete protection against web application attacks, web application attacks behind CDNs, API manipulations, advanced HTTP attacks (slowloris, dynamic floods), brute force attacks on login pages and more.
Offer
Learn more about AWS WAF
Learn more about Radware AppWall
Sample Customers
eVitamins, 9Splay, Senao International
Accuview.com, Ace, ADP, BuyPass, Computershare, DTCC, Firehost, Garanti, HP, Konami, Mohawk, SeatPG, Telenet
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider19%
Media Company15%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider34%
Computer Software Company20%
Manufacturing Company6%
Insurance Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise44%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS WAF vs. Radware AppWall and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,595 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AWS WAF is ranked 2nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 10 reviews while Radware AppWall is ranked 15th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 4 reviews. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Radware AppWall is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "Use this product to make it possible to deploy web applications securely". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware AppWall writes "Stable with high availability and good dashboards". AWS WAF is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 BIG-IP, Akamai Kona Site Defender, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare, whereas Radware AppWall is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 BIG-IP, Fortinet FortiWeb, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare. See our AWS WAF vs. Radware AppWall report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.