Compare AWS WAF vs. Wallarm NG WAF

AWS WAF is ranked 8th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 7 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 11th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. AWS WAF is rated 7.8, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "Makes sure files are protected, but the solution should be more proactive in detecting threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Helps us to monitor attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them". AWS WAF is most compared with Akamai Kona, Imperva Incapsula and F5 BIG-IP, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Cloudflare, Signal Sciences and F5 BIG-IP.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AWS WAF Logo
2,739 views|2,161 comparisons
Wallarm NG WAF Logo
1,536 views|538 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Imperva, Cloudflare and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: November 2019.
378,809 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The ability to take multiple data sets and match those data sets together is the solution's most valuable feature. The data lake that comes with it is very useful because that allows us to match data sets with different configurations that we wouldn't normally be able to match.The initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment took about ten minutes or less.The customized billing is the most valuable feature.It is a one-click WAF with no effort needed.It is Amazon. Everything is scalable. It is beyond what we need.It's simple, easy to use.The most valuable feature is the way it blocks threats to external applications.The most valuable feature is the security, making sure that files are protected, preventing unauthorized users from accessing the system.

Read more »

Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them.

Read more »

Cons
The solution is cloud-based, and therefore the billing model that comes with it could be more intuitive, in my opinion. It's very easy to not fully understand how you tag things for billing and then you can quite easily run up a high bill without realizing it. The solution needs to be more intuitive around the tagging system, which enables the billing. Right now, I have a cloud architect that does that on our behalf and it isn't something that a business user could use because it still requires quite a lot of technical knowledge to do effectively.They should work to define more threats, add more security, and make it more compliant with more security companies.In a future release of this solution, I would like to see additional management features to make things simpler.We need more support as we go global.The user experience, the interface, is lacking. Sometimes it's hard to find certain areas that it has alerted on.In a future release I would like to see automation. There's no interaction between the applications and that makes it tedious. We have to do the preparation all over again for each of our other applications.They have to do more to improve, to innovate more features. They need to increase the security. It has to be more active in detecting threats.

Read more »

The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
There are different scale options available for WAF.There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.It's an annual subscription.

Read more »

​Pricing must be cheaper than the competition and the licensing must be good.​

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
378,809 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,739
Comparisons
2,161
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
377
Avg. Rating
7.9
Views
1,536
Comparisons
538
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
625
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
AWS Web Application FirewallWallarm NG-WAF
Learn
Amazon
Video Not Available
Wallarm
Overview

AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources. AWS WAF gives you control over which traffic to allow or block to your web applications by defining customizable web security rules. You can use AWS WAF to create custom rules that block common attack patterns, such as SQL injection or cross-site scripting, and rules that are designed for your specific application. New rules can be deployed within minutes, letting you respond quickly to changing traffic patterns. Also, AWS WAF includes a full-featured API that you can use to automate the creation, deployment, and maintenance of web security rules.

Next Gen Web Application Firewall with real-time Threat Verification

Founded in 2013, Wallarm provides its award-winning application security solution to hundreds of enterprises and SaaS providers worldwide. Wallarm's hybrid architecture makes it uniquely suited for cloud applications, companies following CI / CD practices and micro-services. Unlike legacy WAF solutions which require signatures and manual configuration of security rules, Wallarm uses machine learning to analyzes traffic and create adaptive security rules to protect both applications and APIs. To help make security more manageable, Wallarm supplements passive protection with active verification of vulnerabilities to distinguish exploitable incidents from noise.

Offer
Learn more about AWS WAF
Learn more about Wallarm NG WAF
Sample Customers
eVitamins, 9Splay, Senao InternationalAcronis: enterpise backup solutions; SEMrush: SEO services; QIWI: NASDAQ-listed payment system; Xsolla: in-games payment system; WarGaming: huge online gaming company; BPC: Banking Technologies
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company36%
Comms Service Provider16%
Media Company15%
Retailer11%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Imperva, Cloudflare and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: November 2019.
378,809 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email