Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs IBM B2B Integrator comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Axway Logo
330 views|149 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
1,736 views|843 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration and IBM B2B Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The automation of all the data transfers is great."

More Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration Pros →

"The best feature is that many companies use the solution so there is a lot of peer support.""The most valuable features are the flexibility and the range of EDI standards that IBM Sterling can handle.""The solution offers good integration capabilities.""Very flexible product; it allows implementing different flows on the same infrastructure.""IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution.""This solution allows for easy integration with heterogeneous applications.""Everything from the order to fulfillment to the payment process, except for physical packing and shipping, is fully automated for some customer orders.""The most valuable feature of IBM B2B Integrator is its security and flexibility."

More IBM B2B Integrator Pros →

Cons
"The initial setup can be a bit tricky."

More Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration Cons →

"Map translator needs more enhancements.""The tool requires you to write a lot of code in Java and XSLT, which makes development tough.""When working on an elaborate rule, I end up creating it in notepad and then pasting it into the Extended Rule window, which is not convenient.""There are also some features in the solution that are not user-friendly, like code lists with no search options. So, we must navigate hundreds of pages to check for one entry.""The mapping, visibility, deployment, and the dashboard could be improved and updated. The communication logs are very poor. They are not easily understood, and we need to navigate to many places for many reasons. You can't just pull the information; it's very tough.""The one thing that is lacking is easy visibility. It's hard to provide business users with a view into the statuses of their transactions.""There should be a single place to do things, rather than making it complicated, not moving away and truncating the old features but instead coming up with the new and still keeping the old stuff confuses people sometimes.""There is no related transaction stored in the database because it's an OLTP application."

More IBM B2B Integrator Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We pay an annual fee based on the number of VPUs. It's fairly reasonable. We're in the middle of analyzing other products, and they're all pretty much in the same range."
  • "The solution is priced at $20,000 to $30,000 per year with no extra costs."
  • "The pricing is based on how many cores are used and the type of cores."
  • "Licensing depends upon the package you opt for within the solution. The solution is a bit costly compared to the other integration tools in the market."
  • "The price of IBM B2B Integrator is too high. However, IBM may be willing to give a discount if there are negotiations. If they see that there is a good opportunity for them they can provide a discount."
  • "The product costs more than 40K."
  • More IBM B2B Integrator Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The automation of all the data transfers is great.
    Top Answer:I don't deal with pricing. I can't speak to the exact cost.
    Top Answer:They are moving into the cloud. We're happy this is happening. Moving into the cloud will take care of all the day-to-day maintenance we have traditionally had to deal with. Updates and backups will… more »
    Top Answer:IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution.
    Top Answer:API integration could be improved. The legacy system could be on the cloud.
    Ranking
    Views
    330
    Comparisons
    149
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    412
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    1,736
    Comparisons
    843
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    450
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    B2Bi, Axway B2Bi, AMPLIFY B2B Integration
    IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Gentran Integration Suite
    Learn More
    Overview

    Axway B2Bi is an advanced B2B gateway solution for establishing connections and managing information flows between your internal applications and your B2B community — on premise or in the cloud.

    B2Bi provides the visibility you need to find information about business-critical files and messages, and the analytics you need to be proactive, react to exceptions, and improve your overall business processes and SLAs.

    Axway B2Bi can replace or consolidate existing B2B and EDI systems and integrate transactions and processes with Oracle, SAP, Lawson and other business systems — all with easy partner on-boarding, high security and scalability, and built-in system administration.

    IBM B2B Integrator helps you securely integrate complex B2B processes with your partner communities. It provides a single, flexible B2B gateway that enables your organization to meet a wide range of B2B integration needs. The solution can improve business processes beyond enterprise boundaries and increase visibility into and across supply and demand chains.

    Sample Customers
    Procter & Gamble, ASEAN, OneHealthPort
    Bonnie Plants, Toshiba Europe, Florida Hospital
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Transportation Company13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Logistics Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Retailer9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business-to-Business Middleware
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is ranked 11th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review while IBM B2B Integrator is ranked 4th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 42 reviews. Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is rated 8.0, while IBM B2B Integrator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration writes "Simplifies processes, has helpful support, and offers useful automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM B2B Integrator writes "A widely-used, on-premises solution with tons of peer support". Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is most compared with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, whereas IBM B2B Integrator is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, SAP Process Orchestration, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI).

    See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

    We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.