Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer and SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product is simple for encrypting data transfer of all the assets in our system.""Axway consolidated all of our communications into one platform, simplifying network and port management. Now, all we have to do is open one port to this application, and we can remove all the firewall rules on that port. It's much more straightforward to manage from a security perspective. We used to rely on an archaic FTP solution, but Axway features SFTP, so it was an improvement security-wise.""It makes a logical link between the inbound/outbound transfer, and makes it clearly visible. This is a very important feature for managing transfer with different environments, and it's very helpful in case of troubleshooting.""It is an easy-to-use and stable product.""It’s very flexible.""AMPLIFY has all the essential features for managing file transfer."

More Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer Pros →

"We use SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server for internal file transfer."

More SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server Pros →

Cons
"Improvement in Data Encoding would be very appreciated (I'm thinking of ASCII-EBCDIC, ASCII-ASCII, etc.).""The areas in need of improvement are the monitoring and the cut-off management, when needed. Today you have at least two solutions: Buy the other Axway suite, Sentinel, or integrate it into your monitoring system.""It is complicated to manage multi-operations, particularly in handling file name changes within file transcripts.""We only hope that they continue to keep updating the solution and improving the offering. They could always do more updates and releases.""The initial setup was quite complex.""One area of improvement is troubleshooting. When a transfer fails, they provide little information about the login, which makes troubleshooting difficult. Also, file transfer scheduling is primitive. By that, I mean you can't define a complex schedule, like scheduling a job to run at particular hours multiple times in a day.""Sometimes, the application's embedded databases couldn't perform well for a higher volume of data."

More Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer Cons →

"The solution’s technical support should be improved."

More SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing and licensing is related to the protocols you choose to support."
  • "It is quite expensive, and because of that, we get good service from them in return for the price paid."
  • "AMPLIFY's license is a one-time investment."
  • "The platform's price aligns with the market."
  • More Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product is simple for encrypting data transfer of all the assets in our system.
    Top Answer:It is complicated to manage multi-operations, particularly in handling file name changes within file transcripts. This particular area needs improvement. There could be an endpoint connection for… more »
    Top Answer:We use SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server for internal file transfer.
    Top Answer:The pricing of the solution is INR 3,00,000. The pricing of the solution should come down.
    Top Answer:The solution’s technical support should be improved. The solution's initial setup and third-party integrations could be improved.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,483
    Comparisons
    917
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    369
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    252
    Comparisons
    211
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    213
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SecureTransport, Axway SecureTransport, AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer, AMPLIFY MFT
    Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server, Serv-U FTP Server
    Learn More
    Overview
    As a multi-protocol MFT gateway, Axway SecureTransport provides the flexibility you need to support virtually any MFT use case. Secure, manage, and track file flows among people and applications inside your enterprise, and beyond your firewall to your user communities, mobile devices, and the cloud. Perform high-volume automated file transfers between systems, sites, lines of business and external partners, to user-driven communications and mobile, folder- and portal-based file sharing.

    Serv-U Managed File Transfer (MFT) - Remote File Sharing | SolarWinds SolarWinds logo Government Customer... logo Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server Enhance security and control over... “Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is a versatile, easy-to-deploy solution that integrates well into... Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is an excellent and cost-effective solution.

    Sample Customers
    BNP Paribas Securities Services, Bollor_, E.ON AG Group, BMW Group, IdenTrust, Gassco, International Post Corporation, SNCF, DB Schenker Logistics, Logius, CSCA, La Poste
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    Media Company9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer is ranked 12th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 7 reviews while SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is ranked 20th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 1 review. Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer is rated 7.8, while SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer writes "Secure application with efficient features for file transfer management ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server writes "The solution can be used for internal file transfer, but its technical support and third-party integrations should be improved". Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer is most compared with MOVEit, IBM Sterling File Gateway, Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer and Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT, whereas SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is most compared with MOVEit, Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT and WS_FTP Server.

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.