We performed a comparison between Axway AMPLIFY API Management and Microsoft Azure API Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This product is a ten when it comes to API management."
"We like the portal for documentation a lot."
"There's drag and drop functionality so that you do not need to have a senior expert developer to make use of the tool. You can get more of your staff trained up to be able to use it as it's not overly technical."
"I don't believe the Salesforce has been fully utilized yet. It gives us quick engagement."
"The best feature of Axway Amplify API Management is its exceptional level of security, which is highly reassuring, coupled with its remarkable capacity to handle substantial volumes of data in impressively efficient turnaround times."
"This platform can be highly scalable."
"In general, API governance provides a better experience for providers."
"The API portal capability is a valuable feature."
"Most of the features are valuable to me."
"It’s easy to set up."
"The price is pretty reasonable for us."
"The initial setup is not that complex, but there are certain challenges."
"This solution is very flexible, and it's very compatible with the other Azure products."
"I like API Management's ability to do hybrid cloud stuff."
"The tool helps to manage APIs."
"There were no scalability issues."
"The portal still has room for improvement."
"The installation process is a bit complex and it could be a lot simpler."
"The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options."
"It would be great if they have an asset report. It's hard to get support for that."
"Areas of improvement include marketing and enhancing the data products area by using ETIs."
"Sometimes we find bugs where certain calls are not returning all the data we need."
"Team management capabilities could be improved."
"The product shows a lack of maturity. The setup is difficult, the tech support and community are lacking, and it is not very stable."
"When you start with Azure API management, you also need to onboard the Azure console and the Azure cloud environment, which comes with a price."
"Some of the DevOps stuff could be easier to work with. The migration paths are a little complicated, and moving code around could be more seamless. There should be less manual migration when several teams work together to publish code to the DevOps."
"Could use clearer configuration when it comes to API policies."
"I would like to see more integration with other platforms, as well as increased security."
"There is a limitation of 32 kb of data in the APIs. Having the limitation increase would be a benefit."
"It would be better if it were easier to transition to Azure from JIRA. For example, different nomenclature must be performed when you shift to Azure from JIRA. JIRA's storage, tasks, and ethics are treated differently from Azure. Here they might become functions, which is not an option in JIRA because that nomenclature difference is there. If someone has to get into the nomenclature, then there can be different tasks from clients, and here, they may be treated as functions. JIRA has sub-tasks, but sub-tasks don't exist in Azure. The nomenclature and the linking between ethics and a function and a story are different, and people may have to learn to adapt to the new nomenclature."
"Multi-tenant functionalities is missing from the system, especially when it comes to the developer code of features."
"Sometimes when immediate support is required, it isn't available."
More Microsoft Azure API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Axway AMPLIFY API Management is ranked 16th in API Management with 12 reviews while Microsoft Azure API Management is ranked 1st in API Management with 67 reviews. Axway AMPLIFY API Management is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Azure API Management is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Axway AMPLIFY API Management writes "An API management solution for ESB and B2B integration between systems with security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure API Management writes "Efficiently manages and monetizes API ". Axway AMPLIFY API Management is most compared with Apigee, Amazon API Gateway, Kong Gateway Enterprise, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Layer7 API Management, whereas Microsoft Azure API Management is most compared with Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Kong Gateway Enterprise and Oracle API Platform Cloud Service. See our Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. Microsoft Azure API Management report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.