We performed a comparison between Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration and webMethods Trading Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."The automation of all the data transfers is great."
"With webMethods, the creation of servers and the utilization of Trading Networks facilitate B2B integration. It resolves any related issues effectively."
"webMethods Trading Networks is a stable solution."
"webMethods Trading Networks is a good solution for interacting with outside of the organization. We can integrate the solutions with multiple outside the organization."
"The initial setup can be a bit tricky."
"The solution should include REST API calls."
"Perhaps in the area of Microservices, where I think Trading Networks could benefit from some improvements."
Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is ranked 11th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review while webMethods Trading Networks is ranked 15th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 4 reviews. Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is rated 8.0, while webMethods Trading Networks is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration writes "Simplifies processes, has helpful support, and offers useful automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Trading Networks writes "Beneficial for external interactions, integrates well, and great support". Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is most compared with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, whereas webMethods Trading Networks is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and IBM B2B Integrator.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
