Axway Synchrony vs SWIFTnet FIN comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Axway Logo
views| comparisons
66% willing to recommend
SWIFT Logo
1,036 views|844 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Axway Synchrony and SWIFTnet FIN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Business-to-Business Middleware
Views
1,036
Comparisons
844
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Synchrony
Learn More
Overview
Information Not Available

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

  • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
  • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
  • Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

Sample Customers
AIFE - Chorus, Soci_t_ Financire de Distribution (SFD) B2B, International Post Corporation, Union Nationale de Mutualit_s Socialistes, State of California, BHF-BANK, DHL, Clearstream MFT, CITIC Pacific Limited, Genzyme, AstraZeneca, Bollor_ Logistics, STET, MOgroep, Dartford Borough Council
Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm58%
Computer Software Company9%
Comms Service Provider4%
Retailer4%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise82%
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Axway Synchrony doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Business-to-Business Middleware while SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 6th in Business-to-Business Middleware. Axway Synchrony is rated 6.6, while SWIFTnet FIN is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Axway Synchrony writes "It provides an API for advanced configuration. Version 6.11.4 is no longer supported by the vendor". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SWIFTnet FIN writes "Has strong stability and professional support". Axway Synchrony is most compared with , whereas SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with SWIFT InterAct.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.