Axway Synchrony vs. SWIFTnet FIN

As of February 2019, Axway Synchrony is ranked unranked in Business-to-Business Middleware with 3 reviews vs SWIFTnet FIN which is ranked 14th in Business-to-Business Middleware. The top reviewer of Axway Synchrony writes "It provides an API for advanced configuration. Version 6.11.4 is no longer supported by the vendor". Axway Synchrony is most compared with Mule ESB, SEEBURGER BIS and IBM B2B Integrator. SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with SWIFT InterAct and Mule ESB.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Axway Synchrony Logo
views| comparisons
SWIFTnet FIN Logo
755 views|486 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Use SWIFTnet FIN? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Seeburger, MuleSoft and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: January 2019.
316,786 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
316,786 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Business-to-Business Middleware
Views
755
Comparisons
486
Reviews
0
Followers
110
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 96% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
Synchrony
Learn
Axway
SWIFT
Video Not Available
Overview
Information Not Available

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

  • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
  • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
  • Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

Offer
Learn more about Axway Synchrony
Learn more about SWIFTnet FIN
Sample Customers
AIFE - Chorus, Soci_t_ FinanciĀre de Distribution (SFD) B2B, International Post Corporation, Union Nationale de Mutualit_s Socialistes, State of California, BHF-BANK, DHL, Clearstream MFT, CITIC Pacific Limited, Genzyme, AstraZeneca, Bollor_ Logistics, STET, MOgroep, Dartford Borough CouncilAlcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Seeburger, MuleSoft and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: January 2019.
316,786 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email