Azul Zing vs TIBCO ActiveSpaces comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Azul Systems Logo
1,516 views|1,333 comparisons
TIBCO Logo
93 views|78 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azul Zing and TIBCO ActiveSpaces based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
1,516
Comparisons
1,333
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
93
Comparisons
78
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
ActiveSpaces
Learn More
Overview

Zing is an advanced Java runtime (JVM) designed for enterprise workloads that require any combination of large memory, high transaction rates, low latency, consistent response times or high sustained throughput. Zing eliminates Java garbage collection as a factor in production, and conforms to the Java SE standard for Java SE 8, 7, and 6.

TIBCO ActiveSpaces is a low-latency, secure, distributed, in-memory data storage technology that can also function as a system of record for terabytes of operational data. TIBCO ActiveSpaces on the one hand, stores it's data in memory on a cluster of machines for fast read access, and on the other hand, it provides distributed persistence on local file systems for very fast write performance.
Sample Customers
Priceline, RBS, Credit Suisse, ING, Creditex, Nielsen, Workday, Saks Fifth Avenue, Entergy, Quotix, Puma and many more.  Visit azul.com for more.
BVC (Columbia Stock Exchange), The Lowry
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm78%
Leisure / Travel Company11%
Computer Software Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Retailer30%
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company13%
Media Company5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business40%
Midsize Enterprise40%
Large Enterprise20%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise4%
Large Enterprise82%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Azul Zing is ranked 16th in Application Infrastructure while TIBCO ActiveSpaces is ranked 28th in Application Infrastructure. Azul Zing is rated 9.6, while TIBCO ActiveSpaces is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Azul Zing writes "We no longer need to concern ourselves with tuning the garbage collector or coding around it, but the profiling tools lag behind those available for Oracle's Java implementation". On the other hand, Azul Zing is most compared with Azul Zulu, Oracle Hotspot and Zulu Embedded, whereas TIBCO ActiveSpaces is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.