We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This solution serves as the basis to understand the MS SSO and MFA capabilities."
"The ability to grant access to other organizations is helpful."
"The interface is well laid out and it is easy to navigate."
"The most valuable feature is that it is very easy to implement, you don't need a lot of effort to set up the solution. This is the most advantageous point, that you can do anything on Azure without taking too much time."
"The single sign-on is very convenient for us."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of scalability."
"The single sign-on of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to set up conditional access, where you can enforce users to connect using multifactor authentication."
"The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory."
"The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."
"The SSO MyApps interface is very basic and needs better customization capabilities."
"Microsoft needs to add a single setup, so whenever resources join the company or are leaving the company, all of the changes can be made with a single click."
"My only pain point in this solution is creating group membership for devices."
"I would rate it an eight out of ten. The price plays a factor in the rating."
"It would be ideal if the solution moved to a passwordless type of environment. It's the future of authentification. It's also more secure and convenient."
"I think the documentation and configuration are both areas that need improvement."
"We would like to have more granularity in the Azure conditional access in order to be able to manage more groups for devices and for applications."
"Technical support could be faster."
"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices."
"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."
"Licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis and the cost depends on the number of users."
"This product is sold as part of the enterprise package and our licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"MFA and P2 licenses for two Azures for fully-enabled scenarios and features cost a lot of money. This is where Okta is trying to get the prices down."
"We are a non-profit organization, so we get good prices from Microsoft for their products. It is working well, but it could be cheaper. For the type of organization we are, it would be good if they could give a little bit more and be more generous like Google, which has completely free services. Microsoft has free versions or web services called Office 365 E1, which is free for use, but we want to have it with more qualified clients."
"We pay about $35 per user."
"I think we're on the E3 — I think it was about 35 dollars per user."
"We got a good deal. If you get rid of all the products providing features that Azure Suite can provide, then it makes sense cost-wise."
"Microsoft has a free version of Azure AD. So, if you don't do a lot of advanced features, then you can use the free version, which is no cost at all because it is underpinning Office 365. Because Microsoft gives it to you as a SaaS, so there are no infrastructure costs whatsoever that you need to incur. If you use the free version, then it is free. If you use the advanced features (that we use), it is a license fee per user."
"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."
The Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) enterprise identity service provides single sign-on and multi-factor authentication to help protect your users from 99.9 percent of cybersecurity attacks. With Azure Active Directory, you get:
- Single sign-on enabling access to your apps from anywhere
- Conditional Access and multi-factor authentication to help protect and govern access
- A single identity platform to engage with internal and external users more securely
- Developer tools to easily integrate identity into your apps and services
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Azure Active Directory Community.
GRANT ACCESS TO YOUR WORKFORCE. GIVE NOTHING TO ATTACKERS.
Your users need quick access to a variety of business resources. You need confidence it’s them knocking – not an attacker. With CyberArk Workforce Identity, you can empower your workforce while keeping threats out.
Frictionless Sign On
Keep workers working, not logging in and out.
Make intelligent access decisions based on AI-powered analytics.
Enable access across any device, anywhere at just the right time.
Azure Active Directory is ranked 1st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 39 reviews while CyberArk Identity is ranked 10th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews. Azure Active Directory is rated 8.4, while CyberArk Identity is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Azure Active Directory writes "With multi-factor authentication, we've seen a marked decrease in the number of threats we've seen come through". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "A stable solution for accessing on-premises active directory". Azure Active Directory is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Google Cloud Identity, AWS Directory Service and ForgeRock, whereas CyberArk Identity is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Okta Workforce Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ, VMware Workspace ONE and LastPass Enterprise. See our Azure Active Directory vs. CyberArk Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.