Compare Azure Active Directory vs. Omada Identity Cloud

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Active Directory vs. Omada Identity Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The ability to grant access to other organizations is helpful.""The interface is well laid out and it is easy to navigate.""The most valuable feature is that it is very easy to implement, you don't need a lot of effort to set up the solution. This is the most advantageous point, that you can do anything on Azure without taking too much time.""The single sign-on is very convenient for us.""The most valuable feature is the ease of scalability.""The single sign-on of the solution is the most valuable aspect.""The most valuable feature is the ability to set up conditional access, where you can enforce users to connect using multifactor authentication.""Its ability to provide secure connections to people at all locations is the most valuable. It is mostly used by enterprises."

More Azure Active Directory Pros »

"It scales in terms of numbers and types of identities. It can govern the on-premise applications as well as the cloud applications. So, it can manage hybrid environments with all types of identities and various load amounts.""The most valuable feature in Omada is the governance. We work with other products and other product vendors, but the sweet spot in the market for Omada is where things are heavy on governance."

More Omada Identity Cloud Pros »

Cons
"Microsoft needs to add a single setup, so whenever resources join the company or are leaving the company, all of the changes can be made with a single click.""My only pain point in this solution is creating group membership for devices.""I would rate it an eight out of ten. The price plays a factor in the rating.""It would be ideal if the solution moved to a passwordless type of environment. It's the future of authentification. It's also more secure and convenient.""I think the documentation and configuration are both areas that need improvement.""We would like to have more granularity in the Azure conditional access in order to be able to manage more groups for devices and for applications.""Technical support could be faster.""The onboarding process for new users can be improved. It can be made simpler for people who have never registered to Azure AD previously and need to create an account and enable the MFA. The initial setup can be made simpler for non-IT people. It should be a bit simpler to use. Unless you get certifications, such as AZ-300 and AZ-301, it is not a simple thing to use at the enterprise scale."

More Azure Active Directory Cons »

"They need to improve the cost for small companies.""I would like to see them expand the functionality of the tool to continue to be competitive with the monsters out there. For example, they could add functionality on the authentication side, functionality that Octa and SailPoint have. But they should do that while maintaining the same simplicity that makes Omada a product of choice today."

More Omada Identity Cloud Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis and the cost depends on the number of users.""This product is sold as part of the enterprise package and our licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.""MFA and P2 licenses for two Azures for fully-enabled scenarios and features cost a lot of money. This is where Okta is trying to get the prices down.""We are a non-profit organization, so we get good prices from Microsoft for their products. It is working well, but it could be cheaper. For the type of organization we are, it would be good if they could give a little bit more and be more generous like Google, which has completely free services. Microsoft has free versions or web services called Office 365 E1, which is free for use, but we want to have it with more qualified clients.""We pay about $35 per user.""I think we're on the E3 — I think it was about 35 dollars per user.""We got a good deal. If you get rid of all the products providing features that Azure Suite can provide, then it makes sense cost-wise.""Microsoft has a free version of Azure AD. So, if you don't do a lot of advanced features, then you can use the free version, which is no cost at all because it is underpinning Office 365. Because Microsoft gives it to you as a SaaS, so there are no infrastructure costs whatsoever that you need to incur. If you use the free version, then it is free. If you use the advanced features (that we use), it is a license fee per user."

More Azure Active Directory Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing is too high for SMBs.""Omada continues to be very competitive on pricing, especially on the Omada cloud product."

More Omada Identity Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:  It is cloud based so it is always updated,
Top Answer: Azure Active Directory is more expensive than Google, but the capabilities they provide are superior.
Top Answer: We had some issues with the migration of users from the local user accounts to Azure AD. It was more like a local issue and had nothing to do with the Azure AD itself. It works fine for SSO, the… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable feature in Omada is the governance. We work with other products and other product vendors, but the sweet spot in the market for Omada is where things are heavy on governance.
Top Answer: Omada continues to be very competitive on pricing, especially on the Omada cloud product.
Top Answer: I would like to see them expand the functionality of the tool to continue to be competitive with the monsters out there. For example, they could add functionality on the authentication side… more »
Ranking
Views
14,985
Comparisons
12,075
Reviews
40
Average Words per Review
1,095
Rating
8.5
Views
242
Comparisons
42
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
1,450
Rating
8.5
Comparisons
Learn More
Omada
Video Not Available
Overview

The Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) enterprise identity service provides single sign-on and multi-factor authentication to help protect your users from 99.9 percent of cybersecurity attacks. With Azure Active Directory, you get:

- Single sign-on enabling access to your apps from anywhere

- Conditional Access and multi-factor authentication to help protect and govern access

- A single identity platform to engage with internal and external users more securely

- Developer tools to easily integrate identity into your apps and services 

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Azure Active Directory Community.

A full-featured identity governance (IGA) solution with a cloud-native architecture for rapid deployment. Omada Identity Cloud is a flexible and future-proof choice that delivers scalable and configurable identity and access management processes with essential IGA capabilities. The solution enables organizations to manage identity lifecycle scenarios, policy and role management, access requests, access certification, and fulfillment using automated provisioning and service tickets. It provides configurable adaptable models out of the box, minimizing the time and cost of administration. Omada Identity Cloud meets the security, compliance, and efficiency needs of business leaders, removing cost and uncertainty from managing identities and access.

Offer
Learn more about Azure Active Directory
Learn more about Omada Identity Cloud
Sample Customers
Azure Active Directory is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm18%
Computer Software Company15%
Manufacturing Company10%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm5%
Government5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business37%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise52%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise77%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Active Directory vs. Omada Identity Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Azure Active Directory is ranked 1st in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) with 45 reviews while Omada Identity Cloud is ranked 6th in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) with 2 reviews. Azure Active Directory is rated 8.6, while Omada Identity Cloud is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Active Directory writes "With multi-factor authentication, we've seen a marked decrease in the number of threats we've seen come through". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Omada Identity Cloud writes "Helps customers that are in danger of failing audits to remain compliant, and reduces TCO when moving from legacy solutions". Azure Active Directory is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Google Cloud Identity, AWS Directory Service and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, whereas Omada Identity Cloud is most compared with . See our Azure Active Directory vs. Omada Identity Cloud report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.