Compare Azure Active Directory vs. Oracle Access Manager

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Active Directory vs. Oracle Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
521,189 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This solution serves as the basis to understand the MS SSO and MFA capabilities.""The ability to grant access to other organizations is helpful.""The interface is well laid out and it is easy to navigate.""The most valuable feature is that it is very easy to implement, you don't need a lot of effort to set up the solution. This is the most advantageous point, that you can do anything on Azure without taking too much time.""The single sign-on is very convenient for us.""The most valuable feature is the ease of scalability.""The single sign-on of the solution is the most valuable aspect.""The most valuable feature is the ability to set up conditional access, where you can enforce users to connect using multifactor authentication."

More Azure Active Directory Pros »

"I would tell others that this solution is reliable. If they are looking for a solution that is reliable and that is scalable, then this is a good one.""The scalability of the solution is good. We haven't felt we've been restricted from expanding as necessary and we haven't heard of any issues from our clients.""In general, the customization that is offered is very good. The company that I am working with currently is using this feature quite extensively.""The product allows customization via custom code.""The product was built to be scalable.""Once it is set up, it is easy to use and it integrates with most of the products on the market.""From a technical perspective, the solution is very good we can operate and control the user by ourselves."

More Oracle Access Manager Pros »

Cons
"The SSO MyApps interface is very basic and needs better customization capabilities.""Microsoft needs to add a single setup, so whenever resources join the company or are leaving the company, all of the changes can be made with a single click.""My only pain point in this solution is creating group membership for devices.""I would rate it an eight out of ten. The price plays a factor in the rating.""It would be ideal if the solution moved to a passwordless type of environment. It's the future of authentification. It's also more secure and convenient.""I think the documentation and configuration are both areas that need improvement.""We would like to have more granularity in the Azure conditional access in order to be able to manage more groups for devices and for applications.""Technical support could be faster."

More Azure Active Directory Cons »

"In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to the interface.""The mobile access to the solution isn't ideal. They should work to improve its functionality.""The pricing of the solution is in need of improvement. Oracle products are very expensive.""The technical support is not very good at all.""The product is complicated and difficult to install and configure.""There are problems with stability.""The initial implementation can definitely be improved because you have to work on several components to configure it correctly.""There could be some improvements in the documentation and overall knowledge base of the solution."

More Oracle Access Manager Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis and the cost depends on the number of users.""This product is sold as part of the enterprise package and our licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.""MFA and P2 licenses for two Azures for fully-enabled scenarios and features cost a lot of money. This is where Okta is trying to get the prices down.""We are a non-profit organization, so we get good prices from Microsoft for their products. It is working well, but it could be cheaper. For the type of organization we are, it would be good if they could give a little bit more and be more generous like Google, which has completely free services. Microsoft has free versions or web services called Office 365 E1, which is free for use, but we want to have it with more qualified clients.""We pay about $35 per user.""I think we're on the E3 — I think it was about 35 dollars per user.""We got a good deal. If you get rid of all the products providing features that Azure Suite can provide, then it makes sense cost-wise.""Microsoft has a free version of Azure AD. So, if you don't do a lot of advanced features, then you can use the free version, which is no cost at all because it is underpinning Office 365. Because Microsoft gives it to you as a SaaS, so there are no infrastructure costs whatsoever that you need to incur. If you use the free version, then it is free. If you use the advanced features (that we use), it is a license fee per user."

More Azure Active Directory Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."

More Oracle Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
521,189 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable features of this solution are security, the conditional access feature, and multifactor authentication.
Top Answer: The pricing is very flexible. There are a few tiers of licensing, and it is a part of an enterprise contract. It is bundled with other services and the pricing is quite reasonable.
Top Answer: The management interface has some areas that need improvement. It doesn't give you an overview similar to a dashboard view for Azure Active Directory. The view can be complicated. There are many… more »
Top Answer: From a technical perspective, the solution is very good we can operate and control the user by ourselves.
Top Answer: The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase.
Top Answer: There could be some improvements in the documentation and overall knowledge base of the solution.
Ranking
1st
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
14,218
Comparisons
11,470
Reviews
37
Average Words per Review
1,120
Rating
8.5
4th
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
1,669
Comparisons
1,108
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
571
Rating
7.5
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

The Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) enterprise identity service provides single sign-on and multi-factor authentication to help protect your users from 99.9 percent of cybersecurity attacks. With Azure Active Directory, you get:

- Single sign-on enabling access to your apps from anywhere

- Conditional Access and multi-factor authentication to help protect and govern access

- A single identity platform to engage with internal and external users more securely

- Developer tools to easily integrate identity into your apps and services 

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Azure Active Directory Community.

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.
Offer
Learn more about Azure Active Directory
Learn more about Oracle Access Manager
Sample Customers
Azure Active Directory is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.
SekerBank, University of Melbourne
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm15%
Computer Software Company12%
Manufacturing Company9%
Renewables & Environment Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Government17%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise55%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise81%
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise42%
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Active Directory vs. Oracle Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
521,189 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Azure Active Directory is ranked 1st in Access Management with 38 reviews while Oracle Access Manager is ranked 4th in Access Management with 6 reviews. Azure Active Directory is rated 8.4, while Oracle Access Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Azure Active Directory writes "With multi-factor authentication, we've seen a marked decrease in the number of threats we've seen come through". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Access Manager writes "Has the ability to customize it with your own code but is too complex for most uses". Azure Active Directory is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Google Cloud Identity, AWS Directory Service and ForgeRock, whereas Oracle Access Manager is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, ForgeRock, IBM Security Access Manager, PingID and Symantec Siteminder. See our Azure Active Directory vs. Oracle Access Manager report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.