We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra ID and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The most valuable feature of Azure AD is its ability to connect with services outside of Microsoft, although documentation is necessary to properly implement these connections."
"Privileged Identity Management (PIM), managed identities, dynamic groups, and extension and security attributes are all great features."
"All of the features are amazing, such as identity governance and privileged identity management."
"The technical support is pretty good."
"The self-password reset if it's enabled and configured properly, really helps a company be able to reset rather than getting IT involved."
"The product is easy to use."
"Privileged Identity Management and Privileged Identity Management make controlling access considerably easier and ensure that authorized access is achieved."
"The valuable features I use daily are enterprise application, conditional access, identity governance, password monitoring, and a password reset."
"The solution is simple to use."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"Everything should be in one package. There are so many different packages. They need to provide guidance because there are so many features and we don't know how to implement them in our organization."
"Better deployment management and visibility functionality would be helpful."
"I believe it can also be integrated into other Microsoft products, as well as more integrations with other solutions."
"The technical support can be confusing - if you're looking for something very specific, it can be hard to get the right answer or a solution."
"Azure Active Directory could be made easier to use. We have large amounts of data and storage. We are looking for video files and media content for applications, we will think about options, such as cloud storage or a CDN."
"An area where there is room for improvement is the ease of use of the dashboards."
"The main issue is that because Active Directory is in the cloud, it will inevitably be dependent on internet connectivity."
"If Microsoft can give us a way to see where this product is running, from a backend perspective, then it would be great."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 190 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 18th in Single Sign-On (SSO). Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Allows users to authenticate from home and has excellent integrations in a simple, stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, Yubico YubiKey, Cisco Duo and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, CyberArk Identity and SailPoint IdentityIQ.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.