We performed a comparison between Azure Backup and ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."It's useful, it works, and it's fairly reliable."
"The fact that Azure Backup is integrated is one of its biggest advantages."
"It's very simple to configure which is very useful. It's not complex to configure it."
"The daily backups have become easier since we no longer need to handle large backups. The use of Azure Backup as a service has proven reliable and simplified our daily operations. Previously, we relied on LTO backups for data retention, but after migrating to the cloud and adopting Azure Backup, the delivery process has become smoother."
"It is a stable solution...The product is worth the money you pay for it."
"It is easy to schedule backups."
"The deployment process is quite easy in Azure."
"First of all, you can schedule a backup for the client. You can schedule it as you like. You can also control the bandwidth, so the backup will not utilize. The internet will depend on the bandwidth."
"Along with its active directory infrastructure, this solution also possesses the ability to recover and exchange, making it a valuable backup tool."
"The Azure Backup support for on-premises service is limited."
"To make it a ten, it should have the ability to extend the retention and to perform a copy of the data outside of the subscription - with no additional costs."
"My company faces a lot of difficulties in restoring any encrypted VM backup."
"The solution is quite technical. I wouldn't describe it as user friendly. It could be simplified a lot to make it more accessible to the average user."
"The extensibility onto hybrid environments needs a bit of tweaking for those on-prem."
"It still does not have a lot of customization, especially if your workloads are not in Azure."
"Azure Backup is limited to certain workloads. It would be helpful if Microsoft focused on enabling backups for Oracle and other unsupported databases."
"In Avamar, the file-based restores are very quick and fast, whereas, in Azure Backup, VM restore is super easy, but if I have to do a file or a folder restore, I have to mount the entire VM image. I have to wait for some time for it to be mounted, and then I have to go inside and then check the file and copy it somewhere. It's a bit of a manual process, whereas in Avamar, you can directly select a file and folder, and it'll recover with whatever permissions you want."
"The solution has few features as it does not focus on managing anything in the application."
More ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Backup is ranked 7th in Backup and Recovery with 50 reviews while ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is ranked 5th in Active Directory Recovery with 1 review. Azure Backup is rated 7.8, while ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Azure Backup writes "Straightforward to set up and manage and allows us to monitor all backups in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus writes "Though this tool lacks the features to allow backups on the same server, it is very easy to use". Azure Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Commvault Cloud, Acronis Cyber Protect and Veritas NetBackup, whereas ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is most compared with Semperis Active Directory Forest Recovery (ADFR), Veeam Backup & Replication, Quest Recovery Manager for Active Directory Disaster Recovery Edition , Rubrik and Quest On Demand Recovery.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.