We performed a comparison between Arcserve UDP and Azure Backup based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are the replication to the cloud and the deduplication."
"This product is extremely user-friendly and it is capable of performing large-scale archive/backup (five+ years worth). It is easy to store, maintain, and check backups."
"The most valuable feature is the duplication."
"Easy restoration and the solution works quickly."
"Global deduplication is the best feature of this solution."
"The product's deployment process was straightforward."
"It is easy to configure."
"It allows us to back up all the servers and centrally manage them."
"I like the product's restoration cases."
"It is a stable solution...It is a highly scalable solution."
"The product is cost-effective compared to other vendors."
"I like that it's a stable solution and their support is good. I think Microsoft's commercial force is superior."
"The most valuable feature is the ease in which it backs up our data."
"I like that it's a simple system."
"It offers seamless integration."
"Enables immediate recovery and immediate restoration."
"I think that the price could still be a bit cheaper and I do not like that they have been purchased by Arcserve."
"Its interface can be improved. I find it unintuitive."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"The tool doesn't provide cloud integration in India."
"A lot of their new technologies are not very good."
"I had an issue with Arcserve UDP during the failover and the secondary machine didn't get back online, even though it ran automatically. I faced the issue during a crisis situation. However, I haven't faced such a problem again."
"The speed of restores should be improved. We have found the speed of large restores rather slow."
"The only problem with the solution is that when I change the drive capacity, it has to do a full backup. It's a problem when I have five servers to backup. When I only want to change the size of the drive, I have to do a full backup that can take one week."
"The solution is still in its infancy; it's not a mature product yet."
"We faced some issues synchronizing the information in Azure when the storage was changed."
"It still does not have a lot of customization, especially if your workloads are not in Azure."
"Azure Backup could improve by offering better integration for Oracle databases and enhancing features like granular restore and backup compliance capabilities."
"The monitoring and tagging features could be improved."
"The compression ratio of the backup data should be improved."
"The integration with the record database and integration with other applications will be good, especially with the database piece."
"The tool's backup should be faster. Azure Backup's support should be faster."
Arcserve UDP is ranked 15th in Backup and Recovery with 40 reviews while Azure Backup is ranked 7th in Backup and Recovery with 50 reviews. Arcserve UDP is rated 7.6, while Azure Backup is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Arcserve UDP writes "Global deduplication, stable, and flexible licensing options". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Backup writes "Easy to install, performs well, and the technical support is helpful ". Arcserve UDP is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Acronis Cyber Protect, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), Veritas Backup Exec and Commvault Cloud, whereas Azure Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Commvault Cloud, Acronis Cyber Protect and Veritas NetBackup. See our Arcserve UDP vs. Azure Backup report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.