We performed a comparison between Azure Container Registry and IBM Cloud Container Registry based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry."The solution has built-in resiliency and replication zone availability so it is very stable."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to download, install and manage."
"What I like best about Azure Container Registry is that it's fast. It also has 24 x 7 reliability. I didn't face any downtime issues using Azure Container Registry. I also like how secure the solution is, especially as it's from Microsoft."
"The continuity screen is a valuable feature."
"Azure Container Registry is an easy-to-install, easy-to-configure, and easy-to-deploy solution."
"It's great for storing images on containers."
"We like the fact that this is a secure solution, that employs a token-based system, which can be used to manage all the applications under this product."
"One of the benefits of this solution is that it's private and secure."
"The product is efficient and can be used for multiple environments."
"It's not an open source, and we pay per hour to Microsoft Azure."
"The accessibility of Azure Container Registry also has room for improvement because the solution is not always accessible 24 x 7. I experienced this three times when the service wasn't responding, so I could not push or pull images, and I had to decommission Azure Container Registry and redeploy it."
"Implementation needs improvement. We have a lot of open, online sources. Doing a deployment is easy for us. The only issue is when we have VPN connections and we try to pull the images from Container images to the local Dockers, it slows down."
"The security, dashboards, and monitoring system could be improved."
"They can improve their scalability."
"It should be easier to use. It can have more graphical interfaces to manage containers. At present, the handling or management of the containers is very basic."
"The deployment is an area that needs improvement, as it can take some time to deploy."
"The solution has become more popular in the last few years but I find that the technical support has not increased their knowledge base, so more knowledgeable support staff can help improve the solution."
"IBM Cloud Container Registry should improve its API management. One improvement factor could be enhancing the integration capabilities of container registries like Harbor with hyperscaler platforms. While some container registries, like Azure Container Registry and IBM Cloud Container Registry, are tightly integrated with their respective hyperscaler environments, others may lack integration options."
Azure Container Registry is ranked 3rd in Container Registry with 16 reviews while IBM Cloud Container Registry is ranked 7th in Container Registry with 1 review. Azure Container Registry is rated 8.2, while IBM Cloud Container Registry is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Azure Container Registry writes "Configurations are quite simple with tokens that set folder structure or access levels". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Cloud Container Registry writes "A free solution that is beneficial for customers who cannot afford to create new containers on-premises". Azure Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, JFrog Container Registry, Harbor, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Red Hat Quay, whereas IBM Cloud Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
