Compare Azure Data Factory vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service

Azure Data Factory is ranked 6th in Data Integration Tools with 10 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 6th in Cloud Data Integration with 5 reviews. Azure Data Factory is rated 8.2, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Azure Data Factory writes "Straightforward and scalable but could be more intuitive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "Good mapping, very user friendly, and easy to maintain". Azure Data Factory is most compared with Talend Open Studio, Informatica PowerCenter and Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Dell Boomi AtomSphere and Mule Anypoint Platform.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Talend and others in Data Integration Tools. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It is easy to deploy workflows and schedule jobs.From my experience so far, the best feature is the ability to copy data to any environment. We have 100 connects and we can connect them to the system and copy the data from its respective system to any environment. That is the best feature.It is a complete ETL Solution.Powerful but easy-to-use and intuitive.The most valuable features are data transformations.Data Factory itself is great. It's pretty straightforward. You can easily add sources, join and lookup information, etc. The ease of use is pretty good.From what we have seen so far, the solution seems very stable.The user interface is very good. It makes me feel very comfortable when I am using the tool.

Read more »

The lack of features in something like Oracle Integration Cloud leaves some room for leads implementation partners like usThe most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value.It's very easy to get started on the solution. It's also easy to maintain, scale, and integrate according to cost factors.

Read more »

Cons
The setup and configuration process could be simplified.The user interface could use improvement. It's not a major issue but it's something that can be improved.The Microsoft documentation is too complicated.The product could provide more ways to import and export data.The speed and performance need to be improved.On the UI side, they could make it a little more intuitive in terms of how to add the radius components. Somebody who has been working with tools like Informatica or DataStage gets very used to how the UI looks and feels.The solution needs to integrate more with other providers and should have a closer integration with Oracle BI.The solution should offer better integration with Azure machine learning. We should be able to embed the cognitive services from Microsoft, for example as a web API. It should allow us to embed Azure machine learning in a more user-friendly way.

Read more »

They need to make tools framework available for implementation partnersNow the platform is not built in a way that you can define.Oracle-based automation blueprints for the majority of the integrations would be helpful to have in a future release.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
This is a cost-effective solution.Our licensing fees are approximately 15,000 ($150 USD) per month.In terms of licensing costs, we pay somewhere around S14,000 USD per month. There are some additional costs. For example, we would have to subscribe to some additional computing and for elasticity, but they are minimal.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration Tools solutions are best for your needs.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
6th
Views
7,322
Comparisons
5,739
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
456
Avg. Rating
8.1
6th
Views
5,617
Comparisons
4,215
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
515
Avg. Rating
7.4
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Oracle ICS
Learn
Microsoft
Oracle
Overview

Create, schedule, and manage your data integration at scale with Azure Data Factory - a hybrid data integration (ETL) service. Work with data wherever it lives, in the cloud or on-premises, with enterprise-grade security.

Oracle Integration Cloud Service (ICS) delivers best in class “Hybrid” Integration. ICS is a simple and powerful integration platform in the cloud to maximize the value of your investments in SaaS and on-premises applications. It includes an intuitive web based integration designer for point and click integration between applications and a rich monitoring dashboard that provides real-time insight into the transactions, all running on a mature runtime platform on Oracle Public Cloud. ICS will help accelerate integration projects and significantly shorten the time-to-market through it's intuitive and simplified designer, an intelligent data mapper, and a library of adapters to connect to various applications.

Offer
Learn more about Azure Data Factory
Learn more about Oracle Integration Cloud Service
Sample Customers
Milliman, Pier 1 Imports, Rockwell Automation, Ziosk, Real Madrid Calix, Avaya, Land Lakes, Leader, PWC, Vale
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company53%
Comms Service Provider9%
Retailer4%
Insurance Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company62%
Financial Services Firm5%
Construction Company4%
Comms Service Provider4%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Talend and others in Data Integration Tools. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Data Integration Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.