We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."It's a Microsoft native tool, so it works well with other Microsoft technologies, which is predominantly what our customer end-user base is."
"The most valuable feature is that it's stable. It hasn't crossed any thresholds."
"We like this searchability and availability of the data."
"Provides an overview and high-level information."
"Technical support is helpful."
"One of the most useful aspects of this solution is the out-of-the-box functionality on all areas, especially on Application Insights, zero instrumentation, and artificial intelligence for event correlation."
"Azure Monitor is useful because of the useful application insights and telemetry, such as metrics and logs."
"The most valuable features of Azure Monitor are the login analytics workspace and we can write any kind of custom queries in order to receive the data that is inserted into the login analytics workspace, diagnostic settings, et cetera."
"The technical support and documentation are quite good."
More Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Pros →
"Azure Monitor could improve the visualization aspect and integrate better with other third-party services."
"The default interface should be improved."
"Azure Monitor is not user-friendly, and the interface is not exciting. Switching between the dashboards is not easy."
"There are a lot of things that take more time to do, such as charting, alerting, and correlation of data, and things like that. Azure Monitor doesn't tell you why something happened. It just tells you that it happened. It should also have some type of AI. Environments and applications are becoming more and more complex every day with hundreds or thousands of microservices. Therefore, having to do a lot of the stuff manually takes a lot of time, and on top of that, troubleshooting issues takes a lot of time. The traditional method of troubleshooting doesn't really work for or apply to this environment we're in. So, having an AI-based system and the ability to automate deployments of your monitoring and configurations makes it much easier."
"I'd like the solution to do more around vulnerability assessment. It's lacking in the product right now."
"n comparison to New Relic, which I've used before, it's a bit more complicated. It's not as easy to use. It also took some time to get it working. The implementation needs to be simpler."
"The troubleshooting logs need improvement. There should be some improvement there. I have a hard time finding the right logs at the right times whenever there is an issue occurring."
"The length of latency is terrible and needs to be improved."
"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."
More Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Cons →
Earn 20 points
Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews while Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is ranked 104th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management writes "Good technical support and scales well for cloud deployments but needs better UI". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, Sentry and Grafana, whereas Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.