Compare Azure Monitor vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This solution allows me to have true visibility for any metrics when it comes to my cloud, and private.""This solution makes it a lot easier to figure out trends within very different data sources, which makes it easy to see why something is misbehaving.""The features I find most valuable is the querying and alerting capabilities.""People are very pleased with the implementation.""The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation.""No issues with stability."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Pros »

"I am impressed by the reporting on the average eight ports that we get from this solution.""It's a service from Microsoft, so it will scale.""The solution integrates well with the Microsoft platform.""A product that is well-integrated for monitoring Microsoft Azure.""The most valuable feature is that it's stable. It hasn't crossed any thresholds.""The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up.""The solution works well overall. It's easy to implement and simple to use.""Good load and metrics gathering and very good analysis."

More Azure Monitor Pros »

"The initial setup was straightforward, without complexity.""The most valuable feature of this solution is its ease of use.""The feature that I have found most valuable in ManageEngine Applications Manager is its dashboard.""ManageEngine Applications Manager maintains the historical data and it's easy for us to analyze the trends and patterns and fix them accordingly."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager Pros »

Cons
"I would like to see integration with Kubernetes cluster and APIs so that you can manage the entire stack.""I would like to see more out-of-the-box dashboards for in-depth application monitoring of standard products that are out there.""In the new version, I would love to see more prediction capabilities. It would be great if one could see the alerts get a little more enriched with information and become more human-friendly instead of the technical stuff that they put in there. I think those would be really awesome outcomes to get.""The implementation is a long process that should be improved.""They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us.""It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for the single click operations as well relational data locality."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Cons »

"They need to work on a more hybrid deployment that will allow us to monitor local on-premise deployments and connect to different systems. I would like to see more integration.""They can simplify the overall complexity since you have multiple data sources in the cloud for monitoring. It's quite simple, but there are so many portals. It takes time to work with it. If they could simplify the user configuration, that would be good.""n comparison to New Relic, which I've used before, it's a bit more complicated. It's not as easy to use. It also took some time to get it working. The implementation needs to be simpler.""As a younger product it still has room for feature improvement and enhancement.""The troubleshooting logs need improvement. There should be some improvement there. I have a hard time finding the right logs at the right times whenever there is an issue occurring.""When something goes down, we want the option to have automation in place to get it back up again as quickly as possible.""I'd like the solution to do more around vulnerability assessment. It's lacking in the product right now.""Automation related to gathering metrics from more applications could be improved."

More Azure Monitor Cons »

"Even with the top-notch dashboard, it could be made stronger in order to have an additional plug-in for analytics.""The dashboards in the interface need a lot of work.""The information provided by ManageEngine is not deep-dive like IBM and CA provide.""They could probably rearrange the UI so that it would be easy for people who are new to the Application Manager to configure things."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Educational pricing is available for this solution.""We were given a year's worth of service. It was included within our ELA. We were trying to do a proof of concept, which is almost over now.""Different locations require different setups. In your terms, around 300 to around 400K USD."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"It is a cost-effective solution.""The cost of this solution is not too bad, although it could be cheaper considering what you're getting for the price.""The licensing costs for ManageEngine Applications Manager are around $1,200 per year. For additional monitors, you have to pay extra."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It’s in INR. Our data is on four sites and these are in the development phase. Different locations require different… more »
Top Answer: It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for… more »
Top Answer: We like this searchability and availability of the data.
Top Answer: The price could be lower but it is not a must.
Top Answer: We are a consulting firm and we have a lot of experience with Microsoft Azure solutions. The Azure Monitor is one of the… more »
Top Answer: The feature that I have found most valuable in ManageEngine Applications Manager is its dashboard.
Top Answer: The information provided by ManageEngine is not deep-dive like IBM and CA provide. For example, ManageEngine does show… more »
Top Answer: Normally, the customer uses ManageEngine to monitor an application by inserting it into the IBM solution from the… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
Wavefront, Wavefront by VMware, VMware Tanzu Observability Applications Manager
Learn
VMware
Microsoft
ManageEngine
Overview

VMware Tanzu Observability provides metrics-driven analytics at massive scale, so you can get the most out of your cloud-native apps.

Azure Monitor maximizes the availability and performance of your applications by delivering a comprehensive solution for collecting, analyzing, and acting on telemetry from your cloud and on-premises environments. It helps you understand how your applications are performing and proactively identifies issues affecting them and the resources they depend on.

ManageEngine Applications Manager is an enterprise-ready, easy-to-use, affordable application management solution that helps enterprises monitor their mission-critical applications and data centers effectively. It enables you to monitor web applications, web servers, application servers, databases, and systems which are the lifeline of businesses. Its heterogeneous monitoring capability and business centric view helps the IT Team to troubleshoot application performance issues quickly.

Offer
Learn more about VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront
Learn more about Azure Monitor
Learn more about ManageEngine Applications Manager
Sample Customers
Box, Intuit, Workday, Groupon, British Gas, SpaceApe, Marketo, DoordDash, LyftRackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group Certis Europe, Financial Domain, SaaS Office Suite, On Demand TV, Parliament's IT Systems, Sastra Technologies, UniServity
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm12%
Retailer5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider11%
Insurance Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
No Data Available
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise30%
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise57%
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Azure Monitor is ranked 9th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 11 reviews while ManageEngine Applications Manager is ranked 27th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 4 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.8, while ManageEngine Applications Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "This integrated add-on for Microsoft Azure helps monitor performance of the base product ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Applications Manager writes "Offers a service to monitor each and every specific feature in a server". Azure Monitor is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Splunk, AppDynamics and BMC TrueSight Operations Management, whereas ManageEngine Applications Manager is most compared with Dynatrace, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, AppDynamics, SCOM and BMC TrueSight Operations Management. See our Azure Monitor vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager report.

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.