Compare Azure Monitor vs. Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
446,626 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I am impressed by the reporting on the average eight ports that we get from this solution.""It's a service from Microsoft, so it will scale.""The solution integrates well with the Microsoft platform.""A product that is well-integrated for monitoring Microsoft Azure.""The most valuable feature is that it's stable. It hasn't crossed any thresholds.""The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up.""The solution works well overall. It's easy to implement and simple to use.""Good load and metrics gathering and very good analysis."

More Azure Monitor Pros »

"The Monitor Templates functionality allowed us to spin up monitoring with .csv files pretty easily.""There's no agent you need installed on the servers. In our environment, we have some servers out of our control so we cannot manage them. We use SiteScope to monitor the availability, the resources on the servers, etc. This allows us to do this job without installing agents so there's no need to take care of anything on the server.""The product's ability to monitor systems and applications and send alerts and create support tickets are the most valuable features of the product.""For the system environment, SiteScope can be useful."

More Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Pros »

Cons
"They need to work on a more hybrid deployment that will allow us to monitor local on-premise deployments and connect to different systems. I would like to see more integration.""They can simplify the overall complexity since you have multiple data sources in the cloud for monitoring. It's quite simple, but there are so many portals. It takes time to work with it. If they could simplify the user configuration, that would be good.""n comparison to New Relic, which I've used before, it's a bit more complicated. It's not as easy to use. It also took some time to get it working. The implementation needs to be simpler.""As a younger product it still has room for feature improvement and enhancement.""The troubleshooting logs need improvement. There should be some improvement there. I have a hard time finding the right logs at the right times whenever there is an issue occurring.""When something goes down, we want the option to have automation in place to get it back up again as quickly as possible.""I'd like the solution to do more around vulnerability assessment. It's lacking in the product right now.""Automation related to gathering metrics from more applications could be improved."

More Azure Monitor Cons »

"They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files.""Sometimes in a huge environment, I think the documentation does not provide the required calculations so you can't know what the required set up should be. You need to test.""It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking.""SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL."

More Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

More Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
446,626 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: We like this searchability and availability of the data.
Top Answer: The price could be lower but it is not a must.
Top Answer: We are a consulting firm and we have a lot of experience with Microsoft Azure solutions. The Azure Monitor is one of the products that we implement for our clients.
Top Answer: For the system environment, SiteScope can be useful.
Top Answer: The tool dashboards are not good and don't meet our customers' needs. Because of this we generally use open source tools like Grafana and we also use Nagios for monitoring as a free tool. We're able… more »
Top Answer: Our company manages four different city hospital environments and all of them have SiteScope but each uses a different version depending on how long ago the product was implemented. We're a government… more »
Ranking
Views
4,933
Comparisons
4,085
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
477
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
3,493
Comparisons
2,218
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
567
Avg. Rating
6.8
Popular Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope
Learn
Microsoft
Micro Focus
Overview

Azure Monitor maximizes the availability and performance of your applications by delivering a comprehensive solution for collecting, analyzing, and acting on telemetry from your cloud and on-premises environments. It helps you understand how your applications are performing and proactively identifies issues affecting them and the resources they depend on.

SiteScope is an agentless application monitoring software that provides heterogeneous and hybrid support, quick time to value, and ease of installation, configuration, and use.
Offer
Learn more about Azure Monitor
Learn more about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope
Sample Customers
Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider11%
Insurance Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider29%
Financial Services Firm29%
Recruiting/Hr Firm14%
Transportation Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company48%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government6%
Insurance Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise30%
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise59%
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
446,626 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Azure Monitor is ranked 9th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 11 reviews while Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is ranked 26th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 4 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.8, while Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "This integrated add-on for Microsoft Azure helps monitor performance of the base product ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope writes "System resource monitoring that generates automated alerts and support tickets". Azure Monitor is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Splunk, AppDynamics and AWS X-Ray, whereas Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is most compared with Dynatrace, Splunk, AppDynamics, SCOM and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor. See our Azure Monitor vs. Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope report.

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.