Compare Azure Site Recovery vs. Datto Cloud Continuity

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Metallic Logo
3,247 views|906 comparisons
Azure Site Recovery Logo
2,891 views|2,360 comparisons
Datto Cloud Continuity Logo
3,681 views|2,091 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery vs. Datto Cloud Continuity and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This solution gives me the full insight without having to use other products, metrics, or reporting tools.""It has significantly reduced the amount of manual work required to manage your backup operations. We're going from an on-prem to a non-on-prem, we're all doing nonsolutions. So we really can't compare it against anything else.""It's taken our backup from being a full-time job to being when you need it, set it up. Our users could be empowered to access their own data backups. Which means we can alleviate a lot of the administration from the backup administrator.""There's no impact on the endpoint. It runs in the background and it's something that you install and then forget about.""The compression and deduplication are great for optimizing bandwidth and speed. I don't have to worry about it or think about it, and, because it's a SaaS solution, I don't have to worry about the storage size.""In terms of the speed of backup, it operates seamlessly, so I'd rate it as excellent... with my daily use and workload, quite honestly I don't even notice when it backs up.""Integration with Active Directory and the Azure platform make it a complete solution.""It's very easy to set up the storage across all platforms. This allows us to be dynamic and change on-the-fly."

More Metallic Pros »

"The solution is very easy to use.""They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product.""It is a very stable product and very scalable.""The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up."

More Azure Site Recovery Pros »

"The solution has the capability to scale well."

More Datto Cloud Continuity Pros »

Cons
"I would like to see some of the code execute a little bit better when I add new licenses and assign licenses to users. I'd like to see that information update a little quicker.""The navigation of it needs improvement in terms of the UX. The product itself, it works as expected. It's all user experience and user interface improvements that could be made and it could be made a little more consumer-friendly.""I would like to see more customizable reports. I have reports going right now, but the daily report, for example, shows something like 40 jobs that ran when there are just a few endpoints on there. I'd like to just know if the endpoint was successfully backed up, not how many times. More customizable reports would be nice to have.""The setup was a little bit difficult for a non-IT person like me. My OneDrive is protected by multifactor authentication, and to get the backup to begin behind that multifactor authentication took a little bit of almost customized support, even though I was following the instructions and the videos. That process could have been easier.""There is room for improvement in the Knowledge Base and error reporting. I would like to see best practices in the Knowledge Base, and have the ability to diagnose errors without contacting support."

More Metallic Cons »

"When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit.""It could include more of a backup and recovery.""We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor.""It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support."

More Azure Site Recovery Cons »

"I don't have any feedback to provide in terms of features that may be lacking."

More Datto Cloud Continuity Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I looked at this at the beginning of the year and I don't remember what the prices were for all the other services, but I thought that Metallic's was fair. It was also highly rated, which was even more important than cost because I need a reliable, secure, backup method."

More Metallic Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."

More Azure Site Recovery Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
474,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Integration with Active Directory and the Azure platform make it a complete solution.
Top Answer: I looked at this at the beginning of the year and I don't remember what the prices were for all the other services, but… more »
Top Answer: There is room for improvement in the Knowledge Base and error reporting. I would like to see best practices in the… more »
Top Answer: The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it… more »
Top Answer: It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on… more »
Top Answer: It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes… more »
Top Answer: The solution has the capability to scale well.
Top Answer: I don't directly deal with billing or licensing. My understanding is it's comparable to what is on the market, however… more »
Top Answer: I don't have any feedback to provide in terms of features that may be lacking. Overall, it's been pretty good. They… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Datto Cloud Continuity for PCs
Learn More
Overview

Metallic is the SaaS division of Commvault that delivers powerful, enterprise-grade backup and recovery technology with simple cloud delivery. With Metallic, you’ll be up and running in as little as 15 minutes with no big upfront investment. Proven Commvault technology with built-in best practices means fast, secure backups and speedy, granular restore to protect you against data loss. Metallic offers solutions for VM & Kubernetes backup, Office 365 backup, endpoint backup, and Salesforce backup, and covers a wide range of workloads running both on premises and in the cloud. Whether you’re protecting 10 terabytes of data or 10,000+, Metallic gives you the best choice and flexibility for your hybrid cloud journey.

Safeguard your data now and later with all the benefits of SaaS - from free trial to hassle-free deployment and simplified ongoing management.

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Datto Cloud Continuity for PCs is much more than just cloud backup. MSPs can protect clients’ Windows-based computers from downtime and data loss and more importantly, rapidly recover data if disaster strikes.

Offer
Learn more about Metallic
Learn more about Azure Site Recovery
Learn more about Datto Cloud Continuity
Sample Customers
Learn more at Metallic.io
Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider23%
Manufacturing Company4%
Financial Services Firm4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider18%
Media Company9%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm6%
Educational Organization6%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise60%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery vs. Datto Cloud Continuity and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Azure Site Recovery is ranked 2nd in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 4 reviews while Datto Cloud Continuity is ranked 19th in Cloud Backup with 1 review. Azure Site Recovery is rated 7.6, while Datto Cloud Continuity is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Provides a seamlessly integrated recovery option for small to medium size enterprise companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datto Cloud Continuity writes "Scalable with good data recovery capabilities and a simple design". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery, Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, VMware SRM and Veeam Cloud Connect, whereas Datto Cloud Continuity is most compared with Acronis Backup, Veeam Backup & Replication, Altaro VM Backup, StorageCraft ShadowProtect and Zerto.

See our list of .

We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.