We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and IBM Disaster Recovery Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Commvault, Nutanix and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service."Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."
"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."
"The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up."
"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."
"They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."
"The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards."
"Provides generally good performance, from protection to production to failover to data recovery."
"It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"Disaster Recovery Services is stable."
"The solution works well for very large organizations. It can scale quite well."
"Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability."
"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."
"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."
"When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit."
"I would like to see more security features."
"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."
"Could have more integration with other platforms."
"Disaster Recovery Services could provide better value for money."
"The infrastructure level of IBM's recovery systems could be improved."
More IBM Disaster Recovery Services Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews while IBM Disaster Recovery Services is ranked 5th in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 2 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while IBM Disaster Recovery Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Disaster Recovery Services writes "Quite stable with good scalability for large organizations but the recovery system infrastructure could be better". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, whereas IBM Disaster Recovery Services is most compared with Precisely Assure MIMIX and Sungard Disaster Recovery Services.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.