Azure Site Recovery vs Lumen SafeHaven comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
1,085 views|841 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Lumen Technologies Logo
32 views|28 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Lumen SafeHaven based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Commvault, Nutanix and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Disaster Recovery as a Service Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Mike Douthitt
Use Lumen SafeHaven?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."
  • "I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."
  • "The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."
  • "They have a license to pay."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is affordable."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."
  • More Azure Site Recovery Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.
    Top Answer:The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required. From an improvement perspective, the solution should provide ease of use to its users and try to be a complete solution… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    1,085
    Comparisons
    841
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    319
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    32
    Comparisons
    28
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SafeHaven, SafeHaven DRaaS, CenturyLink SafeHaven
    Learn More
    Overview

    Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

    CenturyLink SafeHaven DRaaS offers an efficient way to protect your enterprise data and production systems - easily and affordably.

    Sample Customers
    Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace
    Seattle Seahawks, tipico, serco
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Government8%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Insurance Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise59%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Disaster Recovery as a Service
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Commvault, Nutanix and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews while Lumen SafeHaven is ranked 16th in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while Lumen SafeHaven is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, whereas Lumen SafeHaven is most compared with .

    See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.