Most Helpful Review
Use Azure Site Recovery? Share your opinion.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product.
The solution is very easy to use.
It is fast, simple, powerful, and has a price without competition.
Nakivo gives users confidence in knowing that if something happens with their application server, exchange server, or other applications, they can recover it easily and quickly.
Perfect for someone who doesn't want to waste time.
We spend less time to get data recovered.
Creating a backup task in NAKIVO is fast and easy.
This solution was surprisingly easy to configure.
It could include more of a backup and recovery.
When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit.
I would like to have the option of creating a subfolder per job in the backup repository because we had an issue where some files were corrupted and we lost the backup of the majority of the VMs.
We want the backup job to consume fewer resources, as the utilization is very high if we choose the best compression.
It is missing the file and folder backup; however, this product is meant for virtual machine backup and recovery, so that is really outside of the scope of the software.
An improvement would be to include a general data backup solution that is not only for virtual machines.
I think it is important to work not only in replicating the virtual machines in Amazon AWS, but in other cloud systems.
An improvement would be to give us more control over the email alerts, with different emails going to different addresses based on a set of rules.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
I advise that this is the best product for medium or small environments according to my cost-benefit analysis.
Pricing is easy to understand and very affordable.
It's really cheap, and our company saves a significant amount of money on IT backup solutions per year.
The price is not a problem in NAKIVO, as it is the most competitive in the market.
It has a much higher bang for the buck than other products we evaluated.
out of 20 in Disaster Recovery as a Service
Average Words per Review
out of 35 in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
Average Words per Review
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 71% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.
NAKIVO Backup & Replication provides image-based, application-aware, and forever-incremental backup for VMware, Hyper-V, and AWS EC2 VMs. This means that NAKIVO Backup & Replication can capture all VM data, ensure the consistency of applications and databases (such as Exchange, Active Directory, MS SQL, SharePoint) running in VMs, and transfer only changes to the backup repository. NAKIVO Backup & Replication uses native change tracking
Learn more about Azure Site Recovery
Learn more about Nakivo
|Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace||Coca Cola, Honda, 3M, University of Arizona, University of Maryland, University of Arkansas, Johns Hopkins University, Marriott, United States Military Academy West Point, Greenpeace, China Airlines, Radisson Hotels and Resorts, Fujifilm|
No Data Available
Comms Service Provider33%
Software R&D Company23%