Compare Azure Site Recovery vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."

More Azure Site Recovery Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up.
Top Answer: It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication.
Top Answer: It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
4,063
Comparisons
3,319
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
412
Rating
7.5
Views
200
Comparisons
151
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Syncsort Assure QuickEDD, Syncsort Quick-EDD/HA, Quick-EDD/HA
Learn More
Overview

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Protecting critical IBM i applications from downtime and guarding against data loss with simple, scalable, full-featured high availability and disaster recovery products

Offer
Learn more about Azure Site Recovery
Learn more about Precisely Assure QuickEDD
Sample Customers
Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace
Toyota Material Handling Australia, Westpac Pacific Banking, Symphony Health, Wimbledon, OCBC Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider18%
Media Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Metallic, Microsoft, Infrascale and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: September 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Azure Site Recovery is ranked 2nd in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 4 reviews while Precisely Assure QuickEDD is ranked 26th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Azure Site Recovery is rated 7.6, while Precisely Assure QuickEDD is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Provides a seamlessly integrated recovery option for small to medium size enterprise companies". On the other hand, Azure Site Recovery is most compared with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery, Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, VMware SRM and Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, whereas Precisely Assure QuickEDD is most compared with Vision Solutions Double-Take and Precisely Assure MIMIX.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.