We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Precisely Assure QuickEDD based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."
"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."
"The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up."
"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."
"It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs."
"Provides generally good performance, from protection to production to failover to data recovery."
"The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products."
"Synchronous applications are valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Precisely Assure QuickEDD is the backup system."
"We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor."
"One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately."
"I would like to see more security features."
"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."
"It could include more of a backup and recovery."
"When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit."
"Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability."
"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."
"There should be more interactive dashboards."
"Our administrator found the solution easy to use, but once that administrator left, it felt very overwhelming to the individual who took it over."
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews while Precisely Assure QuickEDD is ranked 19th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 2 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while Precisely Assure QuickEDD is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Precisely Assure QuickEDD writes "Trustworthy and provides good availability". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, whereas Precisely Assure QuickEDD is most compared with Precisely Assure MIMIX. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
