We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Veeam Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."
"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."
"What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution."
"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."
"The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards."
"The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up."
"It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"Recovery of backup data is the most valuable feature."
"The initial setup is simple to do in Veeam Backup Replication."
"The documentation is very good. It's also easy to install Veeam Backup and Replication."
"The most valuable features of Veeam Backup Replication are efficient backup and replication. Additionally, Veeam Backup Replication supports all products and vendors."
"The initial setup was not overly complex."
"The interface is very user-friendly."
"Its performance is fine. It supports us very well. It is able to support our policy for RTO, RPO, and other things that we need."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be the new CDP features. It is very popular for my customer's needs."
"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."
"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support."
"The immutable backup could be better."
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."
"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."
"The tool should improve synchronization."
"I would like to see more security features."
"The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The direct SAN backup integration can be perfected by improving the snapshot removal mechanism and process from the storage volumes."
"The initial setup is complex."
"In terms of what can be improved, I would say they could add automations for disaster migrations and for reverse replication. Overall, they need more automation."
"There is some complexity we have experienced when using the solution that should be simplified."
"It would be nice if it could be integrated with third-party solutions like ours. It has been supporting just Windows and virtual machines."
"The solution could improve by having a version to be compatible with the Linux system. They have improved the storage depository using the Linux proxy and Linux storage, but it can completely run on the Linux environment it would be much better."
"I have found that the reporting could improve in its structure."
"Veeam needs to have more support for non-Windows systems and other databases. For example, I can do SQL with Veeam but not Informix or Oracle. This is unfortunate because we have many partners with Oracle systems and Informix databases, and Veeam does not yet have the agents we need for specific Oracle and UNIX operating systems."
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 14 reviews while Veeam Backup & Replication is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 17 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while Veeam Backup & Replication is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Backup & Replication writes "Simple deployment, exceptional restore capability, and seamlessly data recovery". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with VMware SRM, Zerto, CloudEndure Disaster Recovery, VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery and Commvault Cloud, whereas Veeam Backup & Replication is most compared with Acronis Cyber Protect, Azure Backup, Rubrik, Veritas NetBackup and NAKIVO Backup & Replication. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Veeam Backup & Replication report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.