Azure Site Recovery vs Veritas System Recovery comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Veritas System Recovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Site Recovery vs. Veritas System Recovery Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a very stable product and very scalable.""Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs.""The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable.""The solution is very easy to use.""Provides generally good performance, from protection to production to failover to data recovery.""The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products.""Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.""Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."

More Azure Site Recovery Pros →

"The installation was straightforward.""The solution has helped reduce my company's cost by around 50 to 60 percent.""With Veritas System Recovery, we have the option to run an infinite number of full backups according to our requirements.""It has a user-friendly interface.""You can back up the whole image.""The solution captures the system state, so when we restore the system, it will be restored to the state it was in at the time of the backup.""Offers good recovery quickly."

More Veritas System Recovery Pros →

Cons
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional.""In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement.""The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing.""We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor.""One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately.""Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability.""The immutable backup could be better.""The tool should improve synchronization."

More Azure Site Recovery Cons →

"It needs an easier interface.""We faced issues with recovery and restoration.""Veritas System Recovery’s pricing and local support need some improvement.""Lacks the ability to protect the database snapshot.""The pricing could be cheaper.""Veritas System Recovery Manager offers some manager solutions, but there is room for improvement.""The reliability is sometimes lacking.""The product's integration capabilities are an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

More Veritas System Recovery Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."
  • "I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."
  • "The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."
  • "They have a license to pay."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is affordable."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."
  • More Azure Site Recovery Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There is no need to pay any additional fees apart from the licensing costs attached to the solution."
  • More Veritas System Recovery Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.
    Top Answer:The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required. From an improvement perspective, the solution should provide ease of use to its users and try to be a complete solution… more »
    Top Answer:The solution has helped reduce my company's cost by around 50 to 60 percent.
    Top Answer:I don't see any scope for improvement in the product since it is a well-established solution. My company has not faced any production-related issues with Veritas System Recovery, as it has stayed… more »
    Top Answer:I use the solution for daily backup and the restoration of backup files.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,122
    Comparisons
    861
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    319
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    339
    Comparisons
    261
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    362
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Veritas System Recovery 18, System Recovery 18, System Recovery
    Learn More
    Overview

    Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

    Veritas System Recovery 18 delivers superior backup and disaster recovery for servers, desktops, and laptops with a single unified solution that enables businesses to recover from downtime or disasters in minutes. With patented Restore Anyware technology, IT administrators can rapidly restore exactly what they need, when and where they need it - including entire physical and virtual machines to bare metal or dissimilar hardware as well as files, folders, and granular application objects. Unlike other technologies, Veritas System Recovery also provides cross-platform Physical to-Virtual (P2V), Virtual-to-Virtual (V2V), and Virtual to-Physical (V2P) recoveries, making it the perfect complement to physical and virtual environments.

    Sample Customers
    Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace
    Mother's Nutritional Center, Occidental Technical Group
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Government8%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Azure Site Recovery vs. Veritas System Recovery
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery vs. Veritas System Recovery and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews while Veritas System Recovery is ranked 21st in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 7 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while Veritas System Recovery is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas System Recovery writes "The solution can be used for DR testing and allows running an infinite number of full backups". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, whereas Veritas System Recovery is most compared with Veritas Backup Exec, Veritas NetBackup, Veeam Backup & Replication, Acronis Cyber Protect and Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Veritas System Recovery report.

    See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.