We performed a comparison between Bacula Enterprise and Dell NetWorker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers."
"Bacula is pretty stable."
"The solution has extensive documentation and a very active community."
"The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization."
"It works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."
"It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light."
"It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite."
"I feel that it is a good product."
"The most valuable features for us at the moment are NFS, file system backup, and IP backup."
"The software’s best feature is data backup for any system."
"The most valuable feature of Dell NetWorker is its quick configuration and handling of large databases."
"It's a good product that can be integrated easily with the Data domain."
"The interface is user-friendly and can be used by the end-users."
"The best feature is the DR replication for us."
"The backup feature for this product is good. It is easy to set up and easy to scale."
"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."
"A more user-friendly interface (GUI) can be developed."
"The initial setup could be a bit easier."
"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."
"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."
"Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy."
"Easier setup and configuration, perhaps including a GUI, would be an improvement."
"In the next release, I would like to see better pricing and more integration with the other products in Dell EMC."
"The deduplication needs improvement and it could use better integration."
"The implementation process could be improved."
"The price could be cheaper."
"The security features need backup and encryption. It would be nice if they added this feature. I would also like to be able to decrypt when restoring the security features. Hackers can sense these vulnerabilities today, and we need to have our enterprise prepared."
"The UI is not user-friendly."
"The data storage capabilities should be improved."
"The licensing rules are difficult to navigate and understand."
Bacula Enterprise is ranked 29th in Backup and Recovery with 9 reviews while Dell NetWorker is ranked 14th in Backup and Recovery with 73 reviews. Bacula Enterprise is rated 8.6, while Dell NetWorker is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Bacula Enterprise writes "Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dell NetWorker writes "A stable tool that has an easy-to-use GUI that enables quick restoration". Bacula Enterprise is most compared with Bareos, Veeam Backup & Replication, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), Veritas NetBackup and Acronis Cyber Protect, whereas Dell NetWorker is most compared with Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, Dell Avamar, Veeam Backup & Replication, Veritas NetBackup and Commvault Cloud.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
