We performed a comparison between Leiberman RED Identity Management [EOL] and One Identity Safeguard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."It's more of a risk reduction. It takes passwords that are not being managed properly and manages them automatically which really reduces risk."
"We deployed it into our company for controlling a client's behavior in our data center. It is very useful to control their connections, such as RDP."
"We are able to log and get reporting on all privileged activity that is being performed. We like the fact that we can leverage the session recording feature, which is especially valuable when we're dealing with third-party vendors that have to remote into our our boxes and servers to do any work on behalf of the bank. Now, we can record everything they are doing to ensure that they're only doing the changes that were needed. In addition, we use it to leverage knowledge transfer with our internal staff."
"There are numerous valuable data protection features, including the content and information that offer us more scalable protection as needed."
"It's a good solution for managing identities under OneFile for authorization."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"I like the discovery functionality and the change password feature through the check-in. I also like the bulk import with the help of templates that come with it out of the box. With the help of these few features, my tasks are made easier."
"It offers high availability and enables end users to deploy the solution with 99.999 percent uptime, which is crucial in an enterprise environment with a large number of endpoints."
"The solution's most valuable features are the efficiency and the quality of the recording."
"They should improve the application password management. The capability to manage high availability application passwords is its biggest shortcoming."
"There is a lack of documentation and many problems with the plugins."
"For some users, the physical appliance has been a bit buggy."
"The multilanguage functionality does not support the Arabic language, even though this solution is deployed in an Arabic region."
"On a scale of one to ten, the stability is an eight."
"The SPS could be a lot easier to administrate and the parts should be unified, from a design perspective, so that I can recognize the systems as being part of the same package. They feel like they have been forced together."
"The automated change of the passwords, which is now integrated, could be improved to be more flexible regarding different systems."
"It needs more marketing."
"The main point regarding the user experience is that Safeguard has two separate management consoles."
Earn 20 points
Leiberman RED Identity Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM) while One Identity Safeguard is ranked 5th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 38 reviews. Leiberman RED Identity Management [EOL] is rated 7.8, while One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Leiberman RED Identity Management [EOL] writes "It’s greatest ability is that it can easily randomize all local accounts on almost any endpoint". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "Provides us with centralized storage of secrets and credentials, and visibility into the use of privileged access". Leiberman RED Identity Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, WALLIX Bastion, Delinea Secret Server, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and Fudo PAM.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.