Bamboo vs Oracle Hudson CI comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atlassian Logo
3,468 views|3,427 comparisons
Oracle Logo
102 views|83 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bamboo and Oracle Hudson CI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is a subscription required to use Bamboo."
  • "If Bamboo could provide more flexibility on pricing, that would help. On the agent side, if you want to increase the number of agents it should be less expensive. If they can provide some better pricing model, it will help, whether we are going to use it or are already using it."
  • "The server products for small teams used to offer excellent pricing. However, Atlassian has since changed the offering and the pricing is more expensive. I do still think the solution offers good value for money."
  • "The price of Bamboo is reasonable."
  • "I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten."
  • More Bamboo Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    A biased and subjective comparison of Bamboo and Jenkins as CI servers for mobile development, based on practical experience with both. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (Delivery, Distribution) has been around for quite a while. But surprisingly enough on a global scale it pretty much just got into its teen years in regards to mobile development. Well, subjectively, of course. You can see all levels of mobile CI these days. Some would still install builds from Xcode, others would have a quickly patched up build server under their desk. Xcode Bots meet the needs of yet another group of people. Travis CI is good and for open source projects it’s probably the best option. And guess what, I know few successful iOS development companies that develop apps for enterprise clients, and have no CI at all. The advanced level of CI would include distributed build systems with multiple build nodes, support for automated unit and UI tests, running tests on simulator and physical devices, automatic deployment to TestFlight, Hockey App, Over the Air, and much more. It becomes not just mobile development, but spans into areas like DevOps and others. Etsy’s blog post is somewhat outdated but still a very good example of where this path can take you. If you decide to take mobile CI under your total control, you have to pick a build server to start with. I personally have worked with Bamboo for 1.5 years and I’m dealing with Jenkins right now, so I have few insights… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Bamboo is that it is a good tool for CI/CD integration.
    Top Answer:I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten.
    Top Answer:People know more about Jira than Bamboo. In general, people should know that Jira and Bamboo are similar solutions. The marketing strategy of Bamboo is an area of concern where improvements are… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    5th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    3,468
    Comparisons
    3,427
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    528
    Rating
    7.7
    32nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    102
    Comparisons
    83
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    GitLab logo
    Compared 43% of the time.
    Jenkins logo
    Compared 23% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Harness logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Hudson CI
    Learn More
    Overview
    Bamboo is a continuous integration and delivery tool that ties automated builds, tests and releases together in a single workflow. It works great alongside JIRA and Stash providing a fully traceable deployment pipeline.

    Hudson monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently Hudson focuses on the following two jobs:

    • Building/testing software projects continuously, just like CruiseControl or DamageControl. In a nutshell, Hudson provides an easy-to-use so-called continuous integration system, making it easier for developers to integrate changes to the project, and making it easier for users to obtain a fresh build. The automated, continuous build increases productivity.
    • Monitoring executions of externally-run jobs, such as cron jobs and procmail jobs, even those that are run on a remote machine. For example, with cron, all you receive is regular e-mails that capture the output, and it is up to you to look at them diligently and notice when it broke. Hudson keeps those outputs and makes it easy for you to notice when something is wrong.
    Sample Customers
    Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire
    Virgin Media
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company40%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Marketing Services Firm10%
    Non Tech Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bamboo is ranked 5th in Build Automation with 20 reviews while Oracle Hudson CI is ranked 32nd in Build Automation. Bamboo is rated 7.4, while Oracle Hudson CI is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Bamboo writes "High availability, helpful support, and plenty of plugins available". On the other hand, Bamboo is most compared with GitLab, Jenkins, Tekton, Harness and GitHub Actions, whereas Oracle Hudson CI is most compared with Jenkins.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.