Banyan vs Project Cosigno comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Banyan Security Logo
82 views|48 comparisons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
48 views|20 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Banyan and Project Cosigno based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Twingate, Perimeter 81 and others in ZTNA.
To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
18th
out of 34 in ZTNA
Views
82
Comparisons
48
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
21st
out of 34 in ZTNA
Views
48
Comparisons
20
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
ZTNA
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Twingate, Perimeter 81 and others in ZTNA. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Scytale
Learn More
Overview

Traditional secure remote access solutions like VPNs don’t work anymore for today’s world where users, devices, and applications are highly distributed and dynamic. We need three foundational building blocks to provide a complete solution:

1. Quantified Trust: User and device trust are no longer black or white, but rather like shades of grey where depending on the security posture the same user and device may be allowed different levels of access.

2. Continuous Authorization: The channel cannot be validated with just one-time authorization, but rather needs to be continuous authorized based on zero day attacks, unauthorized user activity.

3. Decentralized Enforcement: The access enforcement cannot be centralized to handle the large scale and security concerns of modern enterprises. We need a highly distributed architecture that scales with applications and clouds.

Project Cosigno provides security and infrastructure engineering teams a web-scale, unified platform to broker and issue service identities. Unlike other approaches, the solution provides scalable, cryptographic, platform agnostic identities based on open standards (SPIFFE). As a result, it enables you to boost security operations and developer productivity, reduce application on-boarding, accelerate cloud or container adoption while strengthening your overall security posture.

Sample Customers
Redox, Byton, Veeva, BlueVoyant
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
ZTNA
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Twingate, Perimeter 81 and others in ZTNA. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Banyan is ranked 18th in ZTNA while Project Cosigno is ranked 21st in ZTNA. Banyan is rated 0.0, while Project Cosigno is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Banyan is most compared with , whereas Project Cosigno is most compared with .

See our list of best ZTNA vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.