We compared N-able Cove Data Protection and Barracuda Intronis Backup across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: N-able Cove Data Protection is considered user-friendly and reliable. Users praised its cloud-based data protection and efficient backup and restoration functionalities. Barracuda Intronis Backup is praised for its strong backup capabilities, user-friendly cloud management portal, and staff training opportunities.
Room for Improvement: N-able Cove Data Protection could be improved by simplifying image restoration, enhancing the graphical interface, and offering more detailed user permissions. The Barracuda Intronis Backup could improve its integration, speed, and orchestration capabilities.
Service and Support: N-able Cove Data Protection's customer service is highly regarded for its knowledgeable support team and ability to resolve issues over the phone. Customers have consistently praised Barracuda Intronis Backup for their excellent and knowledgeable technical support. However, some reviewers reported challenges with escalation and communication within the support team.
Ease of Deployment: Setting up N-able Cove Data Protection is considered straightforward and simple, requiring minimal training. However, deploying to virtual machines or specialty setups may require more effort with N-able. The setup process for Barracuda Intronis Backup is simple and involves configuring IP settings and connecting to Cloud Control.
Pricing: N-able Cove Data Protection is competitively priced and offers unlimited storage for on-premise cloud usage. Users like the adjustable scale option for licensing, which helps them save costs and ensures fair pricing. Barracuda Intronis Backup provides a comprehensive and reasonably priced setup package.
ROI: N-able Cove Data Protection has demonstrated notable cost savings, enhanced efficiency, and positive returns on investment for businesses. Barracuda Intronis Backup provides added financial benefits and time efficiency.
Comparison Results: N-able Cove Data Protection offers effective cloud-based data protection and smooth integration with other tools. However, some reviews noted that image restoration could be simplified, and others said the GUI could use a revamp. Barracuda Intronis Backup stands out for its extensive training resources and direct cloud mapping, but users would like to see better performance and integration.
"The backup feature is most valuable. That's why we took it."
"The superior support from Barracuda in setting up, using, and helping with issues for the product."
"Whenever you have a crash or your service is not working, you can just live-boot the machine and have your service up and running."
"The most important feature in Barracuda Backup is the ability to archive the backup of emails."
"Most important is its ease of use. You plug it in, follow the steps, and you have your backup file."
"The most valuable feature is unlimited data storage on the cloud. Even if the employee has left the company for a few years, the backup will still be maintained."
"The most valuable features are the deduplication that analyzes data to identify duplicate patterns and granular restore."
"It is very stable, and I'm very happy with this solution."
"The most valuables feature is the alerts and monitoring that catches the failed backups."
"Because the package includes cloud storage, we don't need to worry about hosting it inside. That was very important to us. And because the vendor has data centers worldwide, our reps in Europe and other places can get to what they need quickly and easily."
"The most valuable aspect is the added protection of having a cloud-based backup service. It provides redundancy in case of data loss."
"I know I won't have an issue if the data is there. The reliability and the confidence that we have is amazing. It doesn't matter. We've had customers have ransomware. We've had customers that have had corruption. We've had customers that have had employees destroy their data. As long as it's been backed up, I know that I can get it back and I know I have nothing to worry about. Our confidence level is very high."
"The user interface is the most valuable. It gives us the ability to check everything. With more than 100 endpoints running that software, I like the ability to quickly check that everything is working correctly. That's one of the biggest selling points."
"The product is simple to use and manage. The customers have access to verify the backups."
"It's their cloud, it's their storage. I don't have to buy a space on Amazon or Google's cloud and then use their software to push it. That works well for me. This way, I don't have to worry about another option or the opportunity that there might be a credential leak."
"It provides a single dashboard for all types of data protection, we monitor everything through a single dashboard. It simplifies everything overall. It allows us to see everything, whether passing or failing any issues, any problems through a single pane of glass that we don't have to click through or adjust as we go forward."
"It would be nice to have some reports generated on the usage, but it is not essential."
"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see cloud support and deduplication functionality."
"The solution needs fine-grained backup capabilities to service individual users. But this is a minor issue considering all that the product does."
"I would like to see better integration with third-party applications."
"Some features like CIFS are not supported that would help speed and flexibility."
"Setting up Barracuda Backup is straightforward."
"This solution could be improved with offering lower prices at scale."
"The solution is pretty expensive. This is the usual customer complaint."
"A disaster recovery console would be an improvement for the product."
"We don't use the solution’s automated recovery testing because SolarWinds made me cross. When they released it, I went, "Oh, well, that's quite good." Because if you use the system, then it supposedly spins up, and on the portal, it gives you a screenshot of the booted device. So, I phoned up, and I said, "Oh, that's really quite cool. How much is that?" They said, "No, no, no. It's all included in your license." I went, "Okay then," and went and deployed it on about half the fleet. One of the options that our customers have is they can pay us a small amount every month for us to test the recovery just to prove that it's viable, and I thought, "Well, this will do that for us. Nice." Then, in the next invoice, we got a charge for it. While It was not a huge amount, I took offense at the fact that we were told that it would be a no extra cost option that was part of our license, but it turns out that it's chargeable. Therefore, we haven't used it since."
"A better default view on my dashboard would be great. There is a lot of useless information there that it pulls up. They could present the dashboard slightly better, in terms of the extra information after the first five columns. The first five columns are awesome. After that, I don't care about the rest, and there are another seven things after that."
"This solution is not very good for image restores, mainly just files. The solution also does not allow you to enable or disable backups. Sometimes, our users will connect via mobile device and it will use their data to perform the backup. If they were able to enable and disable the backup, they would not have this issue."
"An area for improvement that would really work out well would be if there were a little bit more of an elegant handshake relationship between SolarWinds RMM and the PCs that are being backed up, to advise regarding "up" status... Since RMM is an agent that feeds back that a machine is alive and on, I don't see any reason why they can't either tap into that one feature or build the same exact polling within the backup agent, to update right away and say the system is online or offline."
"The only area that needs improvement is that it is a little bit difficult when you get into virtual machines. The initial deployment of Cove is a little tedious, not for standard machines, but when you get into specialty stuff, like Hyper-V."
"For small amounts of data, recovery is easy, but when it's large amounts of data, it takes forever. So, if they can have a service where they put our data on a hard drive and ship it to us as fast as possible, it would be great. Even if there's a fee associated with it, it's fine."
"The reporting feature and functionality need improvement. We would like to see a little bit more detailed reporting that offers more CEO or C-level focused reporting options."
Barracuda Intronis Backup is ranked 5th in MSP Backup with 24 reviews while N-able Cove Data Protection is ranked 1st in MSP Backup with 20 reviews. Barracuda Intronis Backup is rated 8.4, while N-able Cove Data Protection is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Barracuda Intronis Backup writes "Finding data to restore is much easier than rummaging through tapes to find backups". On the other hand, the top reviewer of N-able Cove Data Protection writes "Provides feature flexibility and modularity for our customers". Barracuda Intronis Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Acronis Cyber Protect, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) and Azure Backup, whereas N-able Cove Data Protection is most compared with Acronis Cyber Protect, Veeam Backup & Replication, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Azure Backup and MSP360 Backup. See our Barracuda Intronis Backup vs. N-able Cove Data Protection report.
See our list of best MSP Backup vendors.
We monitor all MSP Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
