Compare Barracuda Email Security Gateway vs. Barracuda Sentinel

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Proofpoint, Fortinet and others in Email Security. Updated: September 2021.
535,919 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable features are Advanced Malware Protection, URL filtering, and of course Reputation Filtering.""It does a great job of preventing spam, malware, and ransomware. I can only go by what people have told me and what I've seen, but I have not seen spam in a year and a half to two years in my own company mailbox. And there are not a lot of catches where it's catching something that should have gotten through, either.""It has the ability to tell us, after an email has been delivered, where else it went, once it got inside. Maybe it's something we wanted it to stop and it didn't stop it, but it notified us later that it was something that it should have stopped. It can give us a trajectory of all the other places that it went internally and it can tell us what files were transferred as well.""Cisco Secure Email Cloud Gateway has allowed our users to be able to concentrate on the emails that they do receive. Previously, our users had to deal with nine million additional emails across the organization, which is nearly 1,000 emails per user to have to deal with a month. That's a massive amount for our staff to deal with and probably several hours of their time. We have a lot of clinical staff, being a hospital. We want to make our staff as productive as possible. By removing a lot of that spam and phishing type emails, this allows them to do their job.""There is a huge return compared to if we didn't have a gateway appliance, as far as blocking malicious emails.""The filtering is definitely better at catching both spam and malicious messages, and there's a lot of extremely granular ability for setting up rules. You can do it the way you want to. The Microsoft solution tends to be pretty limited in how it allows some of that to be done.""Anti-Spam and Advanced Malware Protection are the most valuable features... and we also have the option to block Zero-day attacks.""The solution is very configurable. It has enabled us to configure some specific filters to stop emails that general configurations didn't stop. It's a powerful solution. It can analyze a lot of emails simultaneously, with no problems of capacity or system load."

More Cisco Secure Email Pros »

"The performance is good.""The security protection is the best and it's GUI is user-friendly.""The link protection and anti-phishing features are great.""Eliminating inbox clutter creates an opportunity to be more productive instead of wasting time manually sorting through spam.""Great at blocking spam.""It is very simple to whitelist addresses.""This product is powerful and quite simple to use.""The solution's anti-spam features are its most valuable aspect."

More Barracuda Email Security Gateway Pros »

"In the past, whether we got phishing emails or spam emails, they all went into our inbox. Now, the system is set to automatically put all phishing emails or spam-type emails that it doesn't block but suspects that they're suspicious, into the junk email folder. It gives users a way of giving it a second look or a second thought as to whether this is a real email or not, rather than seeing all the emails in their inbox. Now that they see it in their junk email box, they take further consideration and look at the email harder and determine if it is a phishing email."

More Barracuda Sentinel Pros »

Cons
"The reporting functionality needs to be improved.""Typically, in a phishing email, they try to use a name everybody's going to recognize, like the CEO's name or the CFO's name... With this appliance, the way it's designed at the moment, for us to really stop that with any level of confidence, we have to build a dictionary of all the names of the people we want it to check, and all the ways they could be spelled. My name would be in there as Phillip Collins, Phillip D. Collins, Phillip Dean Collins, Phil Collins, Phil D. Collins. There could be eight or 10 variations of my name that we'd have to put in the dictionary. There's no artificial intelligence to say "Phil Collins" could be all these other things, and to stop phishing from coming through in that way.""I would like more functionality and how to use it for Level 2 type staff. The biggest issue is it needs to be easier to use and navigate.""I use the search all the time. Sometimes, it is hard to search for things and things are hard to find. People come to me all the time, saying, "This email didn't get through." Then, I go searching and don't find it on the first search. You have to think about alternative searches. I don't know if there is an easier way that they could help to find things. I don't know how they could simplify it, because now everybody else is using the cloud and everything is coming from Office 365, or whatever. It is just not the same environment from years ago where everybody had their own server and you could search easier.""The interface is dated. It has looked pretty much the same for 15 years or so. It would be helpful to be able to do everything from one spot. The centralized quarantine and reporting are completely separate from policy administration.""The configuration UI should be made more intuitive. Currently, it takes a while to understand how to do the basic configurations.""They can do it better with web links, with the URLs. They have a technology called Outbreak but it doesn't work as well as we would like.""The UI is definitely one area of improvement because it doesn't match other interfaces and the navigation can be a little clunky."

More Cisco Secure Email Cons »

"The reporting can be improved.""We would like to have a local support center in India so that they are operating in the same time zone and speak the same language.""False positives have given us issues.""The spam filtering is a little too aggressive. You can not get granular enough to back off on what is considered spam and what is not.""Solution requires regular checking to ensure it's 'keeping up' with spam.""This product can always be made more secure.""I would like to have better integration with third-party archival vendors to facilitate moving data in and out.""The deep scanning feature needs to be improved."

More Barracuda Email Security Gateway Cons »

"In terms of improvement, I would like for some of the reporting to be a little bit more robust. There should be more options for recording and more options for searching. For example, more fields to report against, more search criteria, more date filters, etc. They should also make the searching capability a little bit more flexible."

More Barracuda Sentinel Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"You're going to get what you pay for. If you're not willing to pay the price of Cisco, you're not going to get a product that's as good as Cisco. I don't think Cisco is overpriced, because for the last two years I've been comparing it to Microsoft and Cisco has been cheaper and given us more features.""In my previous organization, avoiding four instances of CryptoLocker within an estimated six month period is approximately $600,000 in lost time and effort. Our five year cost was about a million dollars, and the four outages that we had equated to 65 percent of that five year cost.""The licensing was all transferred.""Compared to Cisco's on-prem service, the cost is the same, but you don't have to pay for the hardware and you don't have to maintain the system, as far as upgrades and hardware failures are concerned. It is cheaper to operate on their cloud service than it is to operate with their on-prem service.""Cisco Secure Email and the support are priced well. It's not cheap, but there are other solutions that offer less and cost so much. For example, Microsoft is more expensive than Cisco.""There are additional fees for adding features.""At times, we feel the pricing is a bit too high, but then, there is also room for discounts. We enjoy a lot of discounts, and that is why we are still with them. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

More Cisco Secure Email Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing for the product is fine.""The licensing fees are part of a bundled support package that we pay for.""We pay between $8 and $10 USD per user per month.""The licensing cost is competitive, it's not too high and not too low.""The solution requires a license and we pay annually.""It is a cost-effective and relatively cheap solution as compared to others. Our customers have a yearly subscription. We do have a few customers with monthly subscriptions, but they have cloud-based Email protection, which is a different type of solution. Both solutions are very good.""We paid for an annual license.""There is an annual license required for this solution."

More Barracuda Email Security Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
535,919 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It is doing its work. It is doing what it was actually designed to do. It has ensured we don't have business email… more »
Top Answer: At times, we feel the pricing is a bit too high, but then, there is also room for discounts. We enjoy a lot of… more »
Top Answer: The area of license renewal should be improved. We normally renew our license every year. There is a feature called… more »
Top Answer: We have found some of the valuable features to be how easy the solution is to configure, the graphic support, and the… more »
Top Answer: There are limited administration controls that should be improved. Additionally, the reports available currently are not… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco Email Security, IronPort, Cisco Email Security, ESA, Email Security Appliances
Barracuda Spam and Virus Firewall
Learn More
Overview

Customers of all sizes face the same daunting challenge: email is simultaneously the most important business communication tool and the leading attack vector for security breaches. Cisco Email Security enables users to communicate securely and helps organizations combat Business Email Compromise (BEC), ransomware, advanced malware, phishing, spam, and data loss with a multilayered approach to security.

With the Barracuda Email Security Gateway, protecting against inbound malware, spam, phishing, and Denial of Service attacks ensures that business productivity isn’t impacted by attacks through the email system. Powerful and customizable policies enable further enforcement of detailed requirements that govern inbound email messages.

Sentinel detects threats that traditional email security systems can't. It integrates directly with Microsoft Office 365 APIs to detect attacks coming from both internal and external sources. It uses artificial intelligence to detect signs of malicious intent and deception within every email with virtually no I.T. administration required.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Secure Email
Learn more about Barracuda Email Security Gateway
Learn more about Barracuda Sentinel
Sample Customers
SUNY Old Westbury, CoxHealth, City of Fullerton, Indra
Evolution Recruitment Solutions, Evans Delivery Company, Osoyoos Credit Union, Synovis Life Technologies, Camden County Technical Schools, DEK, Evans Delivery Company, Colgate Rochester Crozer, Hemmera, South Carolina Heart Center, Ferma Corporation, Major League Baseball (MLB), Healy Brothers Automotive Group
ACT Government, Acumen Group, AGIP, Delta Dental Plans Association, Desai/Nasr Consulting Engineers, Inc., Equinox Information Systems, Mazda Technologies, Microsoft, MIT, Suzuki, Terra Resource Group, Texas A&M University
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company19%
Retailer14%
Manufacturing Company10%
Financial Services Firm10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company22%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm17%
Manufacturing Company17%
Energy/Utilities Company17%
Construction Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company20%
Government7%
Educational Organization4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider17%
Construction Company11%
Retailer7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business34%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise41%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise66%
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise25%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Proofpoint, Fortinet and others in Email Security. Updated: September 2021.
535,919 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Barracuda Email Security Gateway is ranked 4th in Email Security with 15 reviews while Barracuda Sentinel is ranked 1st in DMARC Authentication Software with 1 review. Barracuda Email Security Gateway is rated 8.0, while Barracuda Sentinel is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Barracuda Email Security Gateway writes "Get rid of your spam concerns and be more productive with the help of this product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Barracuda Sentinel writes "The system is set to automatically put all phishing emails or spam-type emails it suspects are suspicious, into the junk email folder". Barracuda Email Security Gateway is most compared with Fortinet FortiMail, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Fortinet FortiMail Cloud, SonicWall Email Security and Kaspersky Security for Mail Server, whereas Barracuda Sentinel is most compared with Barracuda Essentials, Proofpoint Email Protection, Mimecast DMARC Analyzer, Avanan and Fortinet FortiMail.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.