Barracuda Vulnerability Manager [EOL] vs R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Barracuda Vulnerability Manager [EOL] and R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
Ranking
Unranked
In Vulnerability Management
Views
537
Comparisons
250
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Vulnerability Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rohde & Schwarz Web Application Firewall, R&S WAF, DenyAll Web Application Security
Learn More
Overview

Most organizations are rightly concerned about web attacks disrupting their systems, applications, networked devices and other infrastructure components. Whether you are running a global enterprise or a small business, vulnerabilities in web applications can lead to costly data breaches that can adversely impact business operations as well as erode customer trust. Furthermore, maintaining web application security can be complex and expensive, especially for IT constrained organizations. Fortunately, the Barracuda Vulnerability Manager combined with the Barracuda Web Application Firewall can help you easily identify vulnerabilities and automatically secure your web application infrastructure.

Beyond the basic capabilities of traditional negative and positive security models, DenyAll’s scoring mechanism, user behavior tracking and advanced detection engines deliver best-of-breed security that won’t let you down. None of our customers have made the headlines with security breaches.

Web Services and automated machine-to-machine communications support business processes, internal and with ecosystem partners that are often critical. DenyAll makes it easy to optimize and secure these XML-based data flows, with capabilities found in no other WAF or SOA Gateway.

Sample Customers
AWS
Information Not Available
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm19%
Manufacturing Company12%
Computer Software Company12%
Government10%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise67%
Buyer's Guide
Vulnerability Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Barracuda Vulnerability Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Vulnerability Management while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 31st in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Barracuda Vulnerability Manager [EOL] is rated 0.0, while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". Barracuda Vulnerability Manager [EOL] is most compared with Radware Alteon, whereas R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Akamai App and API Protector.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.