We performed a comparison between Barracuda Web Application Firewall and Cisco Application Control Engine [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).More Barracuda Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Barracuda Web Application Firewall is ranked 14th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 38 reviews while Cisco Application Control Engine [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Barracuda Web Application Firewall is rated 8.2, while Cisco Application Control Engine [EOL] is rated 4.0. The top reviewer of Barracuda Web Application Firewall writes "Provides strong issue discovery capabilities; enhance the security parameters of web applications and suitable for medium to large enterprises". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Application Control Engine [EOL] writes "Uncertain future. No clear direction yet". Barracuda Web Application Firewall is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, F5 Advanced WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, HAProxy and Kemp LoadMaster, whereas Cisco Application Control Engine [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.