We performed a comparison between Barracuda Web Application Firewall and Indusface AppTrana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The solution is user-friendly and easy to set up."
"We run it with no downtime, because it has good support."
"The most valuable feature is the automatic content filtering."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the simplicity of configuration."
"What I like most about Barracuda Web Application Firewall is its availability. I also like that it's an easy-to-use solution."
"It's very simple and predictable, because Barracuda provides a vision of the current state of your application. It gives you an understanding of what is happening on your site and any attempts against you at your source. This is the main value that Web Application Firewall provides our company. These aspects are also the main reason for this documentation process."
"Parameter Protection is a valuable feature."
"The stability of the solution is good. I don't think we've experienced bugs, crashes, or glitches."
"We use Indusface AppTrana as a firewall."
"The incident reporting needs to be improved."
"I would suggest that someone implementing this product is knowledgeable in the IT field, and with the network needs. It is complex."
"As most people are aware, the implementation is not easy."
"I would like to see an improved capacity to store logs so that they will be available for a longer time."
"Barracuda Web Application Firewall’s scalability needs improvement."
"The solution could use more reports."
"I have issues with the load balancing of the solution which is slow. The connection pooling in Barracuda also doesn't work. There is an issue when someone needs access to a site quickly. The issue is with HTTPS services. I am not sure if they have changed all these in the solution’s latest version."
"The GUI needs to be improved because it sometimes hangs and needs to be restarted."
"The solution should add an enhanced dashboard to make it easy to navigate."
More Barracuda Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →
Barracuda Web Application Firewall is ranked 14th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 38 reviews while Indusface AppTrana is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. Barracuda Web Application Firewall is rated 8.2, while Indusface AppTrana is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Barracuda Web Application Firewall writes "Provides strong issue discovery capabilities; enhance the security parameters of web applications and suitable for medium to large enterprises". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Indusface AppTrana writes "Cost-effective and used as an effective firewall". Barracuda Web Application Firewall is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, F5 Advanced WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, HAProxy and Kemp LoadMaster, whereas Indusface AppTrana is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Web Application Firewall, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, AWS WAF and Akamai App and API Protector.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.