We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Baxter Planning vs. Servigistics

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Baxter Planning Logo
154 views|113 comparisons
Servigistics Logo
220 views|173 comparisons
Ranking
Views
154
Comparisons
113
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
220
Comparisons
173
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Baxter Planning provides service inventory planning and optimization solutions that support service supply chain requirements across diverse industries. Baxter’s innovative solutions seamlessly integrate with your existing IT infrastructure to forecast demand and optimize target stock levels so your company can more efficiently execute supply, replenishment and repair orders.

Servigistics provides service supply chain solutions that help companies transform service business processes, improve revenue & increase client loyalty.
Offer
Learn more about Baxter Planning
Learn more about Servigistics
Sample Customers
Carestream Health, DSL, Maintech, Nokia, Nutanix, Palo Alto Networks, Stanley Black & Decker, Tolt, Triumph Motorcycles
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronšutica, EMC, NedTrain
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company22%
Computer Software Company22%
Construction Company9%
Media Company9%

Baxter Planning is ranked 7th in Inventory Management Software while Servigistics is ranked 4th in Inventory Management Software. Baxter Planning is rated 0.0, while Servigistics is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Baxter Planning is most compared with Oracle Inventory Management, whereas Servigistics is most compared with Syncron Inventory.

See our list of best Inventory Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Inventory Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.