Compare Beta Systems GARANCY IAM Suite vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, ForgeRock, Broadcom and others in Identity Management (IM). Updated: July 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The initial total cost of ownership to implement Omada Identity is not small. The TCO for the implementation is as high as any other solution. However, the cost of maintaining the solution is at par or lower than competitors, including adding more features or maintaining the system after the initial deployment or installation to make sure that they are available for users to use or extending the functionalities of those activities. Those maintenance costs are lower than other vendors, but the initial cost of getting the system installed is still high.""It is licensed per managed user per year.""There were a lot of administrator, partner, and supplier accounts for people who were no longer working for us but still in the system. So, we reduced the number of users no longer with the company, which saved us some money on licensing.""It's a fair price for the on-premises system. Compared with what we had before, it's much cheaper and we get all the modules in one. We tried to go with the cloud, but it was far too expensive.""From an on-prem point of view, the cost is quite transparent and reasonable. The direct cost is primarily for licenses and maintenance on licenses."

More Omada Identity Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"There are many more expensive products on the market, so the pricing is good"

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable functionality of the solution for us is that when employees stop working for the municipality, they… more »
Top Answer: It's a fair price for the on-premises system. Compared with what we had before, it's much cheaper and we get all the… more »
Top Answer: Generally, I find the whole solution to be very good. But the way errors in the system are handled could be improved. If… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: This solution lacks a closed-loop, which causes issues. If on one day (by a single user) multiple requests as submitted… more »
Top Answer: We use this solution to automate lifecycle governance and for role-based access control administration. Within our… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Omada Identity Suite
SAM Enterprise Identity Manager, Garancy Identity Manager
SecurID
Learn More
Omada
Video Not Available
Overview

Omada Identity delivers an end-to-end identity and access management solution with essential identity governance functionality for secure, compliant, and efficient administration of all users' access rights across on-premises or cloud-based systems. The solution provides configurable best practice processes that covers all identity and access related scenarios from providing an access risk overview, management of identities lifecycle, to automated enforcement of policies.

Multi-platform solution with role lifecycle management, role-based access rights control, and extensive self-service capabilities.

RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.
Offer
Learn more about Omada Identity
Learn more about Beta Systems GARANCY IAM Suite
Learn more about RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle
Sample Customers
Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group
Nord/LB, DEVK, Lufthansa, Millennium bcp, Banca Intesa
NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Government57%
Mining And Metals Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Computer Software Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm9%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm9%
Insurance Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Large Enterprise78%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise43%
Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, ForgeRock, Broadcom and others in Identity Management (IM). Updated: July 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Beta Systems GARANCY IAM Suite is ranked 21st in Identity Management (IM) while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is ranked 13th in Identity Management (IM) with 2 reviews. Beta Systems GARANCY IAM Suite is rated 0.0, while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is rated 6.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle writes "A reliable solution with some technical flaws that need to be addressed". Beta Systems GARANCY IAM Suite is most compared with One Identity Manager and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, One Identity Manager, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Oracle Identity Governance and Saviynt.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.