We performed a comparison between BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management and Fudo PAM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The implementation is quite easy because the documents are always online."
"The notable aspect is its ability to capture the application's behavior comprehensively and this thorough analysis is crucial for effective policy management."
"I find the solution’s features like section management, password management, and analytics valuable."
"Scalability is good. I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten."
"It is straightforward. It is a good technology, and it is made to do one single thing."
"The solution's least privilege enforcement has helped us ensure access is given to only the required people."
"One of the valuable features is the absence of any local user in a unique system. All users are defined in the AD; communication is only between Unix and AD."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."
"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."
"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."
"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."
"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."
"The product should improve its price."
"We use a program to automate all of this, but it's not a default feature of BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management."
"The weaknesses are related to the effort required to migrate from existing technologies or having no Privilege Access Management (PAM) at all to adopting technologies like BeyondTrust. It involves changes in processes and can take a significant amount of time, typically six to twelve months."
"The deployment process should be clarified or made simpler. It would be helpful if the solution had in-app tutorials for users to look at as they progress through the system. Sometimes we get lost and need to go back to check what exactly the function was. There should be small hints around major key functions. It would go a long way in speeding up the deployment process."
"The other area to improve is that they rely on MS SQL servers only. You cannot have any other database behind them. They have to be on MS SQL. If they can do something about these issues, this would be a better alternative for some customers."
"Its feature for establishing workflows needs improvement."
"The help system should be improved to provide a quick help guide with each tab within the solution, which explains what each particular function does."
"If you don't get the implementation right at the outset, you will struggle with the product."
"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."
"The stability is not very good."
"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."
"The configuration is difficult."
"Professional training and certification would be great."
More BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is ranked 4th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 27 reviews while Fudo PAM is ranked 21st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 5 reviews. BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is rated 8.0, while Fudo PAM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management writes "Admin rights can be granted and revoked within minutes and that is what everything comes down to, for us". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization". BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is most compared with CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Delinea Secret Server and ARCON Privileged Access Management, whereas Fudo PAM is most compared with WALLIX Bastion, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Delinea Secret Server, One Identity Safeguard and ManageEngine PAM360. See our BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Fudo PAM report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
