Compare BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. One Identity Safeguard

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management with 4 reviews while One Identity Safeguard is ranked 4th in Privileged Access Management with 7 reviews. BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is rated 8.6, while One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management writes "Provides our clients with Session Management and state-of-the-art Password Management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "We are able to demonstrate what has happened on systems and who did what, but we want to be able to generate CSRs from the interface for certificates". BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is most compared with CyberArk PAS, Thycotic Secret Server and CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, whereas One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk PAS, ObserveIT and SailPoint IdentityIQ. See our BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. One Identity Safeguard report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,756 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
I'm a BeyondTrust partner and I have multiple deployments, four or five banks right now. The features that give us quite an edge compared to what our competitors are offering - like IBM or Thycotic - are the Session Management, that is quite a big one; also the recording of keystrokes. In addition, there is the password vaulting and state-of-the-art Password Management, which I haven't seen in other products.It scales easily and the product is stable.Reduces major vulnerabilities by removing local administrator privileges.

Read more »

All sessions are audited and they are indexed/searchable through the GUI.The most unique and valuable features are the upstream and downstream throughput capacities; the Safeguard platform provides agile integration. In actuality, all the features are valuable. They're good, user-friendly.The transparent mode for privileged sessions is a very good solution.It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage.The technical support is tremendous.The transparent mode for privileged sessions is one of the best thing for customers, because they don't see the system in-between.The system is easy to manage, as it is not a system that you will change everything all of a sudden. It evolves most of the time with customer requests.The extensible framework for authentication is one of the most valuable features. We use an MFA plug-in and a lot of different factors, depending on what the business use-cases are. And of course, the auditing functionality is also valuable.

Read more »

Cons
It should support XWindows Remote Desktop Access protocol for Linux/Unix.It only has limited support for Mac.

Read more »

Monitoring of the platform should be easier and more functional so that you can have a clear picture of the running service.Our experience with technical support has been disappointing. We require more prompt and faster response times. We require answers to our questions right away but we haven't received that level of support.On a scale of one to ten, the stability is an eight.The high availability function of the box requires a long time to switch over from one appliance to another.The automated change of the passwords, which is now integrated, could be improved to be more flexible regarding different systems.For some users, the physical appliance has been a bit buggy.We would like to be able to generate certificate signing requests (CSRs) from the interface for certificates.Even though we have two nodes, there's no way to do an upgrade without taking everything completely offline. It would be nice if they could improve that.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
What BeyondTrust was providing was user-based licensing which was a great benefit from the client point of view. Recently, I don't know why, the licensing model has been changed, and that is the reason that they have lost a bit of their edge when it comes to the PAM, against our competition. The asset-based licensing, from the user's point of view, is not beneficial. The licensing should be based on the users. The greater the number of users, the greater will be the load and the greater the scalability problems. I presume that is why the licensing model has changed.PowerBroker for a Mac client is three times the price of the Windows version.

Read more »

The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible.Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
366,756 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
7,299
Comparisons
3,613
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
370
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
2,516
Comparisons
1,177
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
448
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
BeyondTrust PowerBroker, PowerBroker
Learn
BeyondTrust
One Identity
Overview

The BeyondTrust PowerBroker Privileged Access Management Platform is an integrated solution that provides visibility and control over all privileged accounts and users. By uniting capabilities that many alternative providers offer as disjointed tools, the platform simplifies deployments, reduces costs, improves system security, and reduces privilege risks.

One Identity Safeguard securely stores, manages, records and analyzes privileged accounts and access. It is an integrated solution that combines a secure hardened password safe and a session management and monitoring solution with threat detection and analytics.

Offer
Learn more about BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
See it in Action

Learn More About Safeguard

Sample Customers
Aera Energy LLC, Care New England, James Madison UniversityCavium
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider25%
Software R&D Company20%
Financial Services Firm14%
Outsourcing Company10%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,756 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email