Compare BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Citrix, Microsoft and others in Remote Access. Updated: July 2021.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is that this solution can be implemented regardless of the operating system.""Its security, simplicity, and ease of deployment and maintenance are the most valuable. It is FIPS compliant, so it goes through severe penetration testing every one year or two years. They have to maintain this compliance. It is very safe. Customers have been using it in the last eight years because of the simplicity of getting it deployed quickly. Most of the people using the solution had been hacked already, so they needed it quickly. As compared to the other solutions in the market, it can be turned on in production very quickly. You don't really need to have a server. It can be deployed very rapidly on VMware or Hyper-V, and you don't need to do an installation. It is a kind of an all-included package that you just deploy in a VM environment. It is basically a VM that is specifically built for a customer. The way the PRA data solutions work is that you need to build them for each customer because of being hard-coded with their SSL certificate, their web page name, and all that.""The scalability is excellent."

More BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access Pros »

"When we started with RPA, there was a requirement that every credential and the bots themselves be protected through the PAM system. From the get-go, we've had CyberArk in the middle... We've got a pretty robust RPA implementation with our PAM platform. Users, bots, the credentials — everything is managed via our PAM solution.""Right off the bat, the most valuable feature is the DNA scan. It gives us the ability to scan our environment and find the accounts that we're going to need to take under control.""CyberArk is a very stable product and it's a stable product because it has a simple design and a simple architecture that allows you to leverage the economies of scale across the base of your infrastructure that you already have implemented. It doesn't really introduce any new complex pieces of infrastructure that would make it that much more difficult to scale.""CyberArk has been easy for us to implement and the adoption has been good. We've been able to standardize a bunch of things. We've been able to standardize relatively easily with the use of the platforms and managing the policies.""The risk of lost password and forbidden access to resources has been drastically reduced which increased the security level for the entire company,""The technical support is good.""The most valuable feature is Special Monitoring.""The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task."

More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pros »

Cons
"Changing your password should be simplified, and there should not be a charge for it.""It would be very nice if it has an enterprise vault. Currently, it can interact with Password Safe, which is a separate solution and equivalent to Thycotic Secret Server. Instead of having Password Safe as a separate entity, they should combine it with BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access. They have done it in some way, but it is not an enterprise tech solution.""They could probably integrate a wizard or something like that to add a new use case. It could be something that makes it easier to add a new use case."

More BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access Cons »

"The one place where we found that this product really needs to improve is the cloud. Simple integrations don't exist, even today. We don't have anything specific on CyberArk for managing, SaaS products, SaaS vendors, SaaS credentials. I understand it's a vendor-based thing and that they have to coordinate with the other vendors to be able to do that, and there are integrations coming. But these are the major places where CyberArk definitely needs to invest some more time.""It's a big program. To scale excessively, locally, on an on-prem application, takes a lot of servers.""CyberArk has to continue to evolve with that threat landscape to make sure that they're still protecting those credentials that are owned by those that have privileged accounts in the firms.""There is a bit of a learning curve, but it's a pretty complex solution.""It needs better documentation with more examples for the configuration files and API/REST integration""We found a lot of errors during the initial setup. They should work to improve the implementation experience and to remove errors from the process.""The authentication port is available in CyberArk Alero but not Fortinet products.""Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use."

More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"I believe that this solution is priced well. It's the market leader and I think that it's the best solution.""Overall, its pricing is really good. The main difference from all the other vendors is that they have one package that covers all the functionality and modules of the basic PAM, except the add-on modules like adware and server protection. It also doesn't include the licenses for domain controller protection or maybe an API call-related feature. For the basic privileged access management, the bundle pricing is really good, but when it comes to an agent-based solution for advanced cyber protection or application identity managers, it is expensive. Services are also very expensive if you hire the services team from CyberArk, but these guys are really good. For a couple of large banking projects, we had an experience with them. The banks wanted to have things quickly and efficiently, so we had to hire them. If we take four weeks, these guys can do everything on a weekend. They charge quite a big sum of money, but they know the system well.""The price of this solution is quite reasonable.""The solution is very expensive and requires a license. We pay for an enterprise license.""Pricing is quite high and it could be improved.""They have two types of licensing: purchase and subscription. You have to pay for each admin user, such as Microsoft admin, mail admin, database admin, etc."

More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Access solutions are best for your needs.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Its security, simplicity, and ease of deployment and maintenance are the most valuable. It is FIPS compliant, so it goes through severe penetration testing every one year or two years. They have to… more »
Top Answer: It would be very nice if it has an enterprise vault. Currently, it can interact with Password Safe, which is a separate solution and equivalent to Thycotic Secret Server. Instead of having Password… more »
Top Answer: I have a hundred different use cases. They're all different because every customer is different. One of the top use cases is where a third-party vendor needs to internally access one of the servers or… more »
Top Answer: Within the solution, I love the fact that everything is recorded. The configuration capabilities are great, too.
Top Answer: The price of this solution is quite reasonable.
Top Answer: Return on investment on over all product solution cost. especially hardware cost. when the licence increase due to jumpbox concept Hardware requirement also increase. secondly customisation duration… more »
Ranking
13th
out of 35 in Remote Access
Views
1,100
Comparisons
747
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
459
Rating
9.0
Views
36,972
Comparisons
19,289
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
644
Rating
8.2
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Bomgar Privileged Access
CyberArk Privileged Access Security
Learn More
CyberArk
Video Not Available
Overview

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access (formerly Bomgar Privileged Access) lets you secure, manage, and audit vendor and internal remote privileged access without a VPN.

Privileged Remote Access provides visibility and control over third-party vendor access, as well as internal remote access, enabling your organization to extend access to important assets, but without compromising security.

Features include:

- Privileged Access Control: Enforce least privilege by giving users the right level of access.

- Monitor Sessions: Control and monitor sessions using standard protocols for RDP, VNC, HTTP/S, and SSH connections.

- Reduce the Attack Surface: Reduce attacks by consolidating the tracking, approval, and auditing of privileged accounts in one place and by creating a single access pathway.

- Integrate with Password Management: Inject credentials directly into servers and systems with just one click, so users never need to know or see plain text credentials.

- Mobile & Web Consoles: Use mobile apps or web-based consoles anytime, anywhere.

- Audit & Compliance: Create audit trails, session forensics, and other reporting features by capturing detailed session data in real-time or post- session review, and provide attestation reports to prove compliance.

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged access management and a global leader Identity Security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

Offer
Learn more about BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access
Learn more about CyberArk Privileged Access Manager
Sample Customers
Horizon Beverage, Air Liquide, Gateway Bank of Florida
Rockwell Automation
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company22%
Comms Service Provider22%
Government8%
Retailer6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm24%
Insurance Company15%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise67%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise62%
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Citrix, Microsoft and others in Remote Access. Updated: July 2021.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access is ranked 13th in Remote Access with 3 reviews while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 15 reviews. BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access is rated 9.0, while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access writes "Great integration capabilities with excellent support and very good ROI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Provides simplicity and ease of implementation for the right level of security controls". BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access is most compared with WALLIX Bastion, BeyondTrust Remote Support, Thycotic Secret Server, One Identity Safeguard and Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops, whereas CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Thycotic Secret Server, Azure Active Directory, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine).

See our list of .

We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.