We performed a comparison between BIC Platform and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The central dictionary is a valuable feature."
"This is low-cost and very user friendly. A variety of models are available depending on the needs of the customer."
"While this is a new product it has a mature feel from being built by a company with many years in the business."
"The product is easy to use."
"Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."
"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."
"It is an absolutely stable solution."
"Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate."
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."
"The solution could improve its connectivity to other systems."
"There's an issue with the current manual that they're working on."
"As the product is very new, some minor features are still missing, but everything is there to handle day-to-day process modeling."
"The product needs improvement regarding the confidentiality of the domain information for the key administrator."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"We have faced problems with the performance."
"Without a proper frontend, the business cannot effectively use the platform."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"Documentation can be improved."
"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."
"The latency of API could be decreased."
BIC Platform is ranked 18th in Business Process Design with 4 reviews while Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 68 reviews. BIC Platform is rated 8.2, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BIC Platform writes "Provides good stability, but they should add a feature for enterprise architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". BIC Platform is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ARIS BPA, Visio, ADONIS and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian. See our BIC Platform vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
