BIO-key vs Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BIO-key Logo
189 views|129 comparisons
Datablink Logo
views| comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BIO-key and Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
32nd
Views
189
Comparisons
129
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Authentication Systems
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Datablink
Video Not Available
Overview

BIO-key International, Inc. develops, was founded in 1993 and markets fingerprint biometric identification software and hardware. Our network security solutions were designed to identify individuals and verify, or confirm, before granting access, among other things, corporate resources, subscribed data and services, web portals, applications, physical locations or assets using fingerprint authentication. Additionally, BIO-key is proud to be Microsoft's hardware and software partner in creating affordable, high-quality USB Fingerprint scanner accessories for Windows Hello and Windows Hello for Business. Our 25-year track record in delivering transformational enterprise and OEM-embedded biometric solutions is testament to an unwavering commitment: “To empower organizations with strong and multi-factor authentication (MFA) to strengthen online security that is both scalable and cost-efficient, enabling them to achieve rapid time-to-value.

Datablink Mobile 200 offers advanced authentication and financial transactions signing for organizations and their customers. It enables advanced authentication and financial transaction signing. Rather than requiring a user to physically type a code into a device to generate a one-time password, users simply use their smartphone to confirm their identities. No other devices are required. To verify a user's identity or sign a specific transaction, the organization can choose to employ push technology or use a QR Code that is read by the user's smartphone camera. 

Sample Customers
The World Bank, Virginia Tech University, Univerisity of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Union Pacific, St. Luke's Hospital, Singapore Police Force, Security State Bank, Omnicell, Mastercard, Lockheed Martin
Mizuho, Banco Paulista, BTGPactual, Cetip, Telefonica, FIS, TOTVS, ICBC, Azul, Sicob, Unimed, Ype, Digitro, Brinks, Martins, Sicredi
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BIO-key is ranked 32nd in Authentication Systems while Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems. BIO-key is rated 0.0, while Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, BIO-key is most compared with Fortinet FortiToken, whereas Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.