Compare BIO-key vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BIO-key Logo
65 views|56 comparisons
RSA Adaptive Authentication Logo
1,122 views|702 comparisons
Ranking
35th
Views
65
Comparisons
56
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
16th
Views
1,122
Comparisons
702
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Ping Identity and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2021.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

BIO-key International, Inc. develops, was founded in 1993 and markets fingerprint biometric identification software and hardware. Our network security solutions were designed to identify individuals and verify, or confirm, before granting access, among other things, corporate resources, subscribed data and services, web portals, applications, physical locations or assets using fingerprint authentication. Additionally, BIO-key is proud to be Microsoft's hardware and software partner in creating affordable, high-quality USB Fingerprint scanner accessories for Windows Hello and Windows Hello for Business. Our 25-year track record in delivering transformational enterprise and OEM-embedded biometric solutions is testament to an unwavering commitment: “To empower organizations with strong and multi-factor authentication (MFA) to strengthen online security that is both scalable and cost-efficient, enabling them to achieve rapid time-to-value.

RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.
Offer
Learn more about BIO-key
Learn more about RSA Adaptive Authentication
Sample Customers
The World Bank, Virginia Tech University, Univerisity of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Union Pacific, St. Luke's Hospital, Singapore Police Force, Security State Bank, Omnicell, Mastercard, Lockheed Martin
ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Financial Services Firm30%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise86%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Ping Identity and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2021.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BIO-key is ranked 35th in Authentication Systems while RSA Adaptive Authentication is ranked 16th in Authentication Systems. BIO-key is rated 0.0, while RSA Adaptive Authentication is rated 0.0. On the other hand, BIO-key is most compared with , whereas RSA Adaptive Authentication is most compared with RSA Authentication Manager, ThreatMetrix, IBM Trusteer, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Duo Security.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.