Birst vs Interana comparison

Birst Networked BI and Analytics eliminates information silos. Decentralized users can augment the enterprise data model virtually, as opposed to physically, without compromising data governance.

A unified semantic layer maintains common definitions and key metrics.
Birst’s two-tier architecture aligns back-end sources with line-of-business or local data. Birst’s Automated Data Refinement extracts data from any source into a unified semantic layer. Users are enabled with self-service analytics through executive dashboards, reporting, visual discovery, mobile tools, and predictive analytics. Birst Open Client Interface also offers integration with Tableau, Excel and R.

Birst goes to market in two primary ways: as a direct sale, for enterprises using Birst on internal data to manage their business; and embedded, for companies who offer analytic products, by embedding and white-labeling Birst capabilities into their products.

Birst’s is packaged in 3 available formats: Platform and per-user fee; by Department or Business Unit; by end-customer (for embedded scenarios).

Interana empowers everyone in digital businesses, from product, UX, growth and marketing to editorial, sales and support with intuitive visual exploration of behavior in event data.

Best of all, it works directly on raw data – so you get answers to new questions right away – even those requiring new flows, metrics or segmentation. No heavy ETL, data wrangling, re-processing, or help needed from your data team. No limitation to dimensions and perspectives others defined for you.