We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Ability to use different frameworks."
"Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable."
"When developing new pages that have questionable functionality or coding, we will often use CBT to test it in a browser. CBT works with our testing environment and development site."
"Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not only see these attributes on the page clearly but also pass clean data."
"I can run a page through the screenshot tool, then send a URL with the results to my team."
"CrossBrowserTesting allows us to test our site with real-world devices in real-world scenarios and find what we're missing."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time issues while testing."
"The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default."
"This solution would benefit from faster testing and support for more devices."
"We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve."
"The pricing is complicated. It's in the middle."
"SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."
CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.
Bitbar is ranked 26th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while CrossBrowserTesting is ranked 17th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. Bitbar is rated 6.6, while CrossBrowserTesting is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "Has the ability to use different frameworks for testing although it is lacking in capability options". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CrossBrowserTesting writes "Live testing gives us the ability to identify potential issues on different browsers and devices proving to be a very useful tool". Bitbar is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, SmartBear TestComplete, Perfecto and Micro Focus UFT One, whereas CrossBrowserTesting is most compared with BrowserStack, Tricentis Tosca, Sauce Labs, SmartBear TestComplete and Micro Focus UFT One. See our Bitbar vs. CrossBrowserTesting report.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.