We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Bitbar vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bitbar Logo
1,642 views|1,138 comparisons
CrossBrowserTesting Logo
3,339 views|2,023 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbar vs. CrossBrowserTesting and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
555,139 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Ability to use different frameworks.""Game testing and the API for apps are good."

More Bitbar Pros »

"I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable.""When developing new pages that have questionable functionality or coding, we will often use CBT to test it in a browser. CBT works with our testing environment and development site.""Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not only see these attributes on the page clearly but also pass clean data.""I can run a page through the screenshot tool, then send a URL with the results to my team.""CrossBrowserTesting allows us to test our site with real-world devices in real-world scenarios and find what we're missing."

More CrossBrowserTesting Pros »

Cons
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated.""Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."

More Bitbar Cons »

"Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time issues while testing.""The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default.""This solution would benefit from faster testing and support for more devices.""We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve."

More CrossBrowserTesting Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing is complicated. It's in the middle."

More Bitbar Pricing and Cost Advice »

"SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."

More CrossBrowserTesting Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
555,139 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Game testing and the API for apps are good.
Top Answer: Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved.
Top Answer: We use it for AI Testbot testing and mobile app testing.
Top Answer: I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable.
Top Answer: We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve.
Top Answer: We use CrossBrowserTesting for testing our web-based applications.
Ranking
26th
Views
1,642
Comparisons
1,138
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
417
Rating
6.5
17th
Views
3,339
Comparisons
2,023
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
428
Rating
9.3
Comparisons
Also Known As
Testdroid
Learn More
Overview
Testdroid is a set of mobile software development and testing products by Bitbar Technologies Limited. Testdroid comprises three different products: Testdroid Cloud, Testdroid Recorder and Testdroid Enterprise. Testdroid provides an application programming interface through open source software available on GitHub. Testdroid can use testing frameworks, such as Robotium, Appium and uiautomator for native and Selenium for web applications, targeted for mobile application and game developers. Testdroid Cloud contains real Android and iOS powered devices, some of which are available for users. Testdroid Cloud lets users run tests simultaneously on cloud-based service. Testdroid Recorder is a tool for developers and testers for recording user-actions and producing JUnit based test cases on mobile application and games. Testdroid Recorder is available at the Eclipse marketplace. Testdroid Enterprise is a server software for managing automated testing on multiple real Android and iOS powered devices, supporting Gradle build system and Jenkins Continuous Integration.

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

  • Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
  • Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.
Offer
Learn more about Bitbar
Learn more about CrossBrowserTesting
Sample Customers
Rovio, Paf, Supercell, NITRO Games, Seriously, AVG, Google, Bosch, Yahoo, Microsoft, Yandex, Mozilla, eBay, PayPal, TESCO, Cisco WebEx, Facebook, LinkedIn, skype, Subway
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government7%
Insurance Company6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
University10%
Healthcare Company10%
Media Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider17%
Insurance Company7%
Media Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise50%
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbar vs. CrossBrowserTesting and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
555,139 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Bitbar is ranked 26th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while CrossBrowserTesting is ranked 17th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. Bitbar is rated 6.6, while CrossBrowserTesting is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "Has the ability to use different frameworks for testing although it is lacking in capability options". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CrossBrowserTesting writes "Live testing gives us the ability to identify potential issues on different browsers and devices proving to be a very useful tool". Bitbar is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, SmartBear TestComplete, Perfecto and Micro Focus UFT One, whereas CrossBrowserTesting is most compared with BrowserStack, Tricentis Tosca, Sauce Labs, SmartBear TestComplete and Micro Focus UFT One. See our Bitbar vs. CrossBrowserTesting report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.