We performed a comparison between Bitbar and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."Ability to use different frameworks."
"Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very scalable solution."
"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability."
"Easy to use and easily scalable."
"Visual Studio is an exemplary integrated development environment that stands out due to its exceptional features. It allows for the seamless selection of the appropriate programming language for the specific development tasks at hand. This facilitates a swift and effortless transition between languages, providing a highly efficient development experience."
"What I like most about Visual Studio Test Professional is the way people publish templates and publish integration."
"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options."
"It could be available for multiple platforms and other operating systems like Mac with a native port."
"The performance could be faster."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"Its UI could be better."
"The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution."
"I would like to see more integration in the solution."
"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Bitbar is ranked 26th in Functional Testing Tools while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 8th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. Bitbar is rated 7.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Bitbar is most compared with BrowserStack, SmartBear TestComplete, CrossBrowserTesting, Sauce Labs and LambdaTest, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.